Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research
Open Access

Subjective social isolation or loneliness in older adults residing in social housing in Ontario: a cross-sectional study

Gina Agarwal, Melissa Pirrie, Angela Gao, Ricardo Angeles and Francine Marzanek
September 28, 2021 9 (3) E915-E925; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200205
Gina Agarwal
Departments of Family Medicine (Agarwal, Pirrie, Angeles, Marzanek), and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Agarwal), and Faculty of Health Sciences (Gao), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
MBBS PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Pirrie
Departments of Family Medicine (Agarwal, Pirrie, Angeles, Marzanek), and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Agarwal), and Faculty of Health Sciences (Gao), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Gao
Departments of Family Medicine (Agarwal, Pirrie, Angeles, Marzanek), and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Agarwal), and Faculty of Health Sciences (Gao), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
BHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Angeles
Departments of Family Medicine (Agarwal, Pirrie, Angeles, Marzanek), and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Agarwal), and Faculty of Health Sciences (Gao), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francine Marzanek
Departments of Family Medicine (Agarwal, Pirrie, Angeles, Marzanek), and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Agarwal), and Faculty of Health Sciences (Gao), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Participant flow diagram.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Sociodemographic factors, health behaviours and health-related quality of life for all study participants and by social isolation subgroup

    VariableNo. (%) of participants
    All participants
    n = 806
    Not socially isolated*
    n = 645
    Socially isolated†
    n = 161
    Demographics
    Gender
     Male197 (24.4)154 (23.9)43 (26.7)
     Female609 (75.6)491 (76.1)118 (73.3)
    Age, yr
     55–64124 (15.4)107 (16.6)17 (10.6)
     65–84517 (64.1)407 (63.1)110 (68.3)
     ≥ 85153 (19.0)124 (19.2)29 (18.0)
     No response12 (1.5)7 (1.1)5 (3.1)
    Ethnicity
     White603 (74.8)480 (74.4)123 (76.4)
     Other203 (25.2)165 (25.6)38 (23.6)
    Education
     Some high school or less357 (44.3)293 (45.4)64 (39.8)
     High school diploma185 (23.0)151 (23.4)34 (21.1)
     Any postsecondary education250 (31.0)192 (29.8)58 (36.0)
     No response14 (1.7)9 (1.4)5 (3.1)
    Marital status
     Divorced154 (19.1)111 (17.2)43 (26.7)
     Common-law12 (1.5)5 (0.8)7 (4.3)
     Married155 (19.2)140 (21.7)15 (9.3)
     Separated40 (5.0)27 (4.2)13 (8.1)
     Single, never married95 (11.8)68 (10.5)27 (16.8)
     Widowed310 (38.5)259 (40.2)51 (31.7)
     No response40 (5.0)35 (5.4)5 (3.1)
    Lives alone625 (77.5)489 (75.8)136 (84.5)
     No response6 (0.7)5 (0.8)1 (0.6)
    Ontario region‡
     South West292 (36.2)223 (34.6)69 (42.9)
     Central West272 (33.7)229 (35.5)43 (26.7)
     South East125 (15.5)97 (15.0)28 (17.4)
     North East117 (14.5)96 (14.9)21 (13.0)
    Income insecure120 (14.9)73 (11.3)47 (29.2)
     No response2 (0.2)1 (0.2)1 (0.6)
    Has a family doctor722 (89.6)573 (88.8)149 (92.5)
    Chronic cardiometabolic disease
    Had a stroke or TIA134 (16.6)102 (15.8)32 (19.9)
     No response4 (0.5)4 (0.6)0 (0.0)
    Had a heart attack101 (12.5)78 (12.1)23 (14.3)
     No response3 (0.4)2 (0.3)1 (0.6)
    History of hypertension558 (69.2)457 (70.9)101 (62.7)
     No response8 (1.0)6 (0.9)2 (1.2)
    History of hyperlipidemia452 (56.1)369 (57.2)83 (51.6)
     No response4 (0.5)2 (0.3)2 (1.2)
    Has diabetes251 (31.1)188 (29.1)63 (39.1)
     No response4 (0.5)3 (0.5)1 (0.6)
    Health behaviours
    Low physical activity322 (40.0)234 (36.3)88 (54.7)
     No response7 (0.9)6 (0.9)1 (0.6)
    Alcohol drinker43 (5.3)29 (4.5)14 (8.7)
     No response8 (1.0)7 (1.1)1 (0.6)
    Current smoker117 (14.5)77 (11.9)40 (24.8)
     No response8 (1.0)6 (0.9)2 (1.2)
    High BMI (overweight or obese)525 (65.1)425 (65.9)100 (62.1)
     No response64 (7.9)50 (7.8)14 (8.7)
    Health status and quality of life
    Self-reported poor to fair health254 (31.5)180 (27.9)74 (46.0)
     No response5 (0.6)4 (0.6)1 (0.6)
    Mobility problems411 (51.0)319 (49.5)92 (57.1)
     No response7 (0.9)3 (0.5)4 (2.5)
    Self-care problems151 (18.7)105 (16.3)46 (28.6)
     No response9 (1.1)4 (0.6)5 (3.1)
    Problems doing usual activities260 (32.3)185 (28.7)75 (46.6)
     No response6 (0.7)4 (0.6)2 (1.2)
    Pain or discomfort511 (63.4)396 (61.4)115 (71.4)
     No response6 (0.7)4 (0.6)2 (1.2)
    Anxiety or depression386 (47.9)255 (39.5)114 (70.8)
     No response18 (2.2)13 (2.0)5 (3.1)
    Social isolation
     Isolated204 (25.3)59 (9.1)145 (90.1)
     Left out227 (28.2)75 (11.7)152 (94.4)
     Lacks companionship295 (36.6)142 (22.0)153 (95.1)
    • Note: BMI = body mass index, TIA = transient ischemic attack.

    • ↵* Subjective social isolation (loneliness) score less than 6.

    • ↵† Subjective social isolation (loneliness) score of 6 or greater.

    • ↵‡ South West: Grey County, Guelph, Halton Region, Hamilton, Norfolk Region. Central West: Peel Region, York Region. South East: Frontenac County, Hastings Region. North East: Hearst, Iroquois Falls, Matheson, Sudbury, Timmins.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Univariate and multivariable binomial logistic regression of having self-reported social isolation*

    VariableUnadjusted OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)†
    Demographics
    Gender
     MaleRef.Ref.
     Female0.86 (0.58–1.28)0.88 (0.52–1.50)
    Age, yr
     55–64Ref.Ref.
     65–841.70 (0.98–2.96)1.99 (1.01–3.93)
     ≥ 851.47 (0.77–2.83)2.05 (0.91–4.60)
    Ethnicity
     WhiteRef.Ref.
     Other0.90 (0.60–1.35)1.13 (0.67–1.91)
    Education
     Some high school or lessRef.Ref.
     High school diploma1.03 (0.65–1.63)0.98 (0.57–1.70)
     Any postsecondary1.38 (0.93–2.06)1.54 (0.94–2.52)
    Lives alone
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes1.75 (1.09–2.80)1.72 (0.96–3.09)
    Income insecurity
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes3.25 (2.14–4.94)2.10 (1.24–3.53)
    Chronic cardiometabolic disease
    At least 1 chronic cardiometabolic disease‡
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes0.69 (0.43–1.11)0.44 (0.24–0.80)
    Health behaviours
    Physical activity
     InactiveRef.Ref.
     Active0.47 (0.33–0.67)0.47 (0.30–0.73)
    Alcohol drinker
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes2.01 (1.04–3.91)2.45 (1.09–5.54)
    Smoking status
     NonsmokerRef.Ref.
     Current smoker2.45 (1.60–3.77)1.42 (0.81–2.51)
    Health status and quality of life
    General health
     Poor to fairRef.Ref.
     Good, very good, excellent0.45 (0.32–0.65)0.60 (0.38–0.94)
    Mobility problems
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems1.43 (1.01–2.04)0.85 (0.51–1.43)
    Self-care problems
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems2.14 (1.43–3.19)1.46 (0.80–2.66)
    Problems doing usual activities
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems2.20 (1.54–3.14)1.20 (0.69–2.11)
    Pain or discomfort
     NoneRef.Ref.
     Any problems1.62 (1.10–2.37)1.17 (0.73–1.90)
    Anxiety or depression
     NoneRef.Ref.
     Any problems7.75 (4.91–12.23)6.05 (3.65–10.03)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, Ref. = reference.

    • ↵* Logistic regressions compare participants who reported being socially isolated (score of ≥ 6) v. not socially isolated (score < 6).

    • ↵† Multivariable regression included participants with complete data (socially isolated n = 141, not socially isolated n = 599).

    • ↵‡ At least 1 of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart attack, diabetes, or stroke or transient ischemic attack.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Univariate and multivariable binomial logistic regression of having self-reported social isolation among participants who live alone*

    VariableUnadjusted OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR† (95% CI)
    Demographics
    Gender
     MaleRef.Ref.
     Female0.57 (0.36–0.89)0.72 (0.39–1.32)
    Age, yr
     55–64Ref.Ref.
     65–841.90 (1.03–3.49)2.07 (0.98–4.36)
     ≥ 851.45 (0.70–3.00)1.78 (0.73–4.36)
    Ethnicity
     WhiteRef.Ref.
     Other1.04 (0.65–1.66)1.19 (0.66–2.14)
    Education
     Some high school or lessRef.Ref.
     High school diploma1.18 (0.71–1.96)1.14 (0.63–2.09)
     Any postsecondary1.53 (0.99–2.37)1.59 (0.93–2.72)
    Income insecurity
     NoRef.
     Yes3.00 (1.91–4.73)1.93 (1.11–3.37)
    Chronic cardiometabolic disease
    At least 1 chronic cardiometabolic disease‡
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes0.70 (0.41–1.21)0.53 (0.27–1.04)
    Health behaviours
    Physical activity
     InactiveRef.Ref.
     Active0.44 (0.30–0.64)0.45 (0.27–0.73)
    Alcohol drinker
     NoRef.Ref.
     Yes2.22 (1.09–4.53)3.11 (1.27–7.63)
    Smoking status
     NonsmokerRef.Ref.
     Current smoker1.85 (1.15–2.96)1.10 (0.60–2.01)
    Health status and quality of life
    General health
     Poor to fairRef.Ref.
     Good, very good, excellent0.49 (0.33–0.72)0.67 (0.41–1.10)
    Mobility problems
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems1.63 (1.10–2.42)1.08 (0.62–1.90)
    Self-care problems
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems1.98 (1.27–3.10)1.28 (0.67–2.44)
    Problems doing usual activities
     No problemsRef.Ref.
     Any problems2.09 (1.41–3.09)1.25 (0.67–2.30)
    Pain or discomfort
     NoneRef.Ref.
     Any problems1.46 (0.96–2.20)1.14 (0.68–1.93)
    Anxiety or depression
     NoneRef.Ref.
     Any problems8.40 (5.04–13.98)6.27 (3.59–10.97)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, Ref. = reference.

    • ↵* Logistic regressions compare participants who reported being socially isolated (score of ≥ 6) v. not socially isolated (score < 6) among those who live alone.

    • ↵† Multivariable regression included participants with complete data (socially isolated n = 121, not socially isolated n = 457).

    • ↵‡ At least 1 of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart attack, diabetes, or stroke or transient ischemic attack.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Univariate binomial logistic regression of having self-reported social isolation in participants who do not live alone*

    VariableUnadjusted OR (95% CI)
    Demographics
    Gender
     MaleRef.
     Female2.04 (0.80–5.21)
    Age, yr
     55–64Ref.
     65–841.63 (0.35–7.66)
     ≥ 852.46 (0.45–13.39)
    Ethnicity
     WhiteRef.
     Other0.86 (0.36–2.09)
    Education
     Some high school or lessRef.
     High school diploma0.92 (0.30–2.84)
     Any postsecondary1.10 (0.38–3.15)
    Income insecurity
     NoRef.
     Yes4.67 (1.52–14.37)
    Chronic cardiometabolic disease
    At least 1 chronic cardiometabolic disease†
     NoRef.
     Yes0.51 (0.18–1.43)
    Health behaviour
    Physical activity
     InactiveRef.
     Active0.59 (0.29–1.65)
    Alcohol drinker
     NoRef.
     Yes0.89 (0.11–7.61)
    Smoking status
     NonsmokerRef.
     Current smoker10.21 (3.27–31.89)
    Health status and quality of life
    General health
     Poor to fairRef.
     Good, very good, excellent0.37 (0.15–0.91)
    Mobility problems
     No problemsRef.
     Any problems0.71 (0.29–1.73)
    Self-care problems
     No problemsRef.
     Any problems2.41 (0.90–6.50)
    Problems doing usual activities
     No problemsRef.
     Any problems2.43 (1.01–5.87)
    Pain or discomfort
     No problemsRef.
     Any problems3.03 (0.99–9.32)
    Anxiety or depression
     NoneRef.
     Any problems4.99 (1.77–14.07)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, Ref. = reference.

    • ↵* Logistic regressions compare participants who reported being socially isolated (score of ≥ 6) v. not socially isolated (score < 6) among those who live alone.

    • ↵† At least 1 of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart attack, diabetes, or stroke or transient ischemic attack.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 9 (3)
Vol. 9, Issue 3
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Subjective social isolation or loneliness in older adults residing in social housing in Ontario: a cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Subjective social isolation or loneliness in older adults residing in social housing in Ontario: a cross-sectional study
Gina Agarwal, Melissa Pirrie, Angela Gao, Ricardo Angeles, Francine Marzanek
Jul 2021, 9 (3) E915-E925; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Subjective social isolation or loneliness in older adults residing in social housing in Ontario: a cross-sectional study
Gina Agarwal, Melissa Pirrie, Angela Gao, Ricardo Angeles, Francine Marzanek
Jul 2021, 9 (3) E915-E925; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200205
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Chronic disease prevalence and preventive care among Ontario social housing residents compared with the general population: a population-based cohort study
  • Conceptualising the context and mechanisms for tackling loneliness in older adults through interventions: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis
  • Randomised controlled trial of the Caring Connections intervention to reduce loneliness and perceived social isolation in persons with spinal cord injuries and disorders: study protocol
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Community Medicine
    • Geriatric Medicine
      • Other geriatric medicine
    • Lifestyle
      • Other lifestyle
    • Public Health
      • Other public health
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Nonclinical
    • Epidemiology
      • Socioeconomic determinants of health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire