Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research
Open Access

Explaining the gaps in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada: a cross-sectional study

Mohammad Hajizadeh, Min Hu, Yukiko Asada and Amy Bombay
March 08, 2021 9 (1) E215-E223; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200177
Mohammad Hajizadeh
School of Health Administration (Hajizadeh, Hu), and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Asada), and Department of Psychiatry and School of Nursing (Bombay), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min Hu
School of Health Administration (Hajizadeh, Hu), and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Asada), and Department of Psychiatry and School of Nursing (Bombay), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukiko Asada
School of Health Administration (Hajizadeh, Hu), and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Asada), and Department of Psychiatry and School of Nursing (Bombay), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Bombay
School of Health Administration (Hajizadeh, Hu), and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Asada), and Department of Psychiatry and School of Nursing (Bombay), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Percentage point contribution of explained and unexplained components to the differences in psychological distress scale and the prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide plan between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada. Percentage point contributions of explained component were calculated by dividing the sum of the contribution of all variables in each category by the total difference in the corresponding mental health outcome. Some percentages do not add up to 100 as a result of rounding.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Summary statistics of variables used in the study

    Variable% or mean ± SD
    TotalWomenMen
    Non-IndigenousIndigenousp valueNon-IndigenousIndigenousp valueNon-IndigenousIndigenousp value
    Outcome
    10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score15.1 ± 5.116.1 ± 5.9< 0.00115.3 ± 5.316.5 ± 6.40.00714.8 ± 4.815.6 ± 5.50.03
    Lifetime suicidal ideation9.216.8< 0.0019.719.1< 0.0018.714.60.005
    Lifetime suicide plan2.36.8< 0.0012.67.70.0082.05.90.006
    Demographic variables*
    Age, yr47.4 ± 17.941.3 ± 15.5< 0.00148.0 ± 18.241.7 ± 15.0< 0.00146.7 ± 17.641.1 ± 16.0< 0.001
    Marital status
     Married or common law62.159.70.460.657.60.463.661.60.6
     Divorced or widowed13.411.50.217.716.10.59.17.10.2
     Single24.528.90.0721.726.30.0927.331.30.3
    Socioeconomic variables*
    Equivalized household income, $†54 426 ± 87 06246 550 ± 37 582< 0.00152 076 ± 111 10244 482 ± 32 8370.0156 846 ± 51 63448 488 ± 41 4850.002
    Education
     Less than high school13.920.80.00213.417.40.0714.424.00.008
     High school17.416.40.617.720.30.517.212.60.06
     Some postsecondary7.57.00.77.58.40.67.55.70.2
     Bachelor’s degree or higher61.255.80.0661.553.90.0460.957.70.4
    Employment status
     Employed61.957.60.155.956.1> 0.968.258.90.02
     Unemployed28.934.50.0333.737.70.324.031.60.03
     Other employment status9.27.90.410.46.20.0037.99.50.4
    Homeownership
     Owner77.166.2< 0.00176.462.7< 0.00177.869.40.004
     Renter22.933.8< 0.00123.637.3< 0.00122.230.60.004
    Household arrangement
     Single person16.112.90.0217.412.30.00514.813.50.5
     Couple with no child32.125.70.00630.529.10.733.722.50.001
     Couple with child or children younger than 25 yr31.333.70.4530.824.40.0131.742.40.03
     Separated with child younger than 25 yr5.17.60.046.712.10.0093.53.30.9
     Other household compositions15.420.20.0214.622.2< 0.00116.018.20.5
    Geographical factors*
    Urbanicity
     Urban77.678.30.821.120.70.923.822.70.7
     Rural22.421.70.878.979.30.976.277.30.7
    Geographic region
     Atlantic‡8.99.50.69.19.40.88.79.60.5
     Quebec26.99.5< 0.00127.410.0< 0.00126.49.0< 0.001
     Ontario35.332.20.335.526.30.033537.60.6
     Prairie‡17.533.7< 0.00116.937.5< 0.00118.230< 0.001
     British Columbia11.515.20.0711.216.80.0611.713.60.5
    Observations17 36793395355147832419
    Represented population17 818 298754 9829 037 405365 3008 780 893389 682
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Explanatory variables.

    • ↵† Annual household income equivalized by dividing it by the square root of household size as per the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development publications (29) and logged to correct for skewness in analyses.

    • ↵‡ Atlantic includes the provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick; Prairie includes the provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    The coefficients and marginal effects obtained from the ordinary least squares and logistic models for psychological distress scale, lifetime suicidal ideation and lifetime suicide plan*

    DeterminantsPsychological distress scaleLifetime suicidal ideationLifetime suicide plan
    Total coefficientsWomen coefficientsMen coefficientsTotal marginal effectsWomen marginal effectsMen marginal effectsTotal marginal effectsWomen marginal effectsMen marginal effects
    Indigenous identity (Ref: Indigenous)
     Non-Indigenous−0.38 (0.21 to −0.97)−0.56 (0.32 to −1.43)−0.18 (0.61 to −0.96)−4.12 (−2.06 to −6.18)−5.05 (−2.01 to −8.09)−3.35 (−0.57 to −6.13)−2.05 (−1.13 to −2.97)−2.58 (−1.01 to −4.15)−1.49 (−0.49 to −2.49)
    Demographic variables
    Sex (Ref: female)
     Male−0.45 (−0.7 to −0.20)−1.05 (−2.38 to 0.28)−0.58 (−1.31 to 0.15)
    Age, yr−0.05 (−0.07 to −0.04)−0.07 (−0.08 to −0.05)−0.04 (−0.05 to −0.03)−0.11 (−0.17 to −0.05)−0.12 (−0.2 to −0.04)−0.09 (−0.17 to −0.01)−0.02 (−0.04 to 0.01)0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03)−0.03 (−0.05 to −0.01)
    Marital status (Ref: married or common law)
     Divorced or widowed0.03 (−0.56 to 0.61)−0.23 (−1.09 to 0.63)0.41 (−0.43 to 1.26)−0.35 (−3.23 to 2.53)−1.04 (−4.9 to 2.82)0.96 (−2.92 to 4.84)−0.40 (−1.69 to 0.89)−1.19 (−2.93 to 0.55)0.34 (−1.23 to 1.91)
     Single0.03 (−0.49 to 0.56)−0.53 (−1.33 to 0.28)0.57 (−0.11 to 1.24)0.20 (−2.37 to 2.77)−1.09 (−4.27 to 2.09)1.41 (−2.37 to 5.19)0.17 (−0.91 to 1.25)−0.23 (−1.48 to 1.02)0.36 (−1.17 to 1.89)
    Socioeconomic variables
    Log equivalized household income, $−0.74 (−0.92 to −0.56)−0.83 (−1.08 to −0.57)−0.65 (−0.92 to −0.39)−1.09 (−1.83 to −0.35)−1.25 (−2.31 to −0.19)−1.05 (−2.07 to −0.03)−0.39 (−0.68 to −0.10)−0.52 (−0.97 to −0.07)−0.31 (−0.62 to 0)
    Education (Ref: less than high school)
     High school−0.56 (−1.11 to −0.02)−0.70 (−1.63 to 0.24)−0.44 (−1.05 to 0.17)−2.71 (−5.45 to 0.03)−3.33 (−7.50 to 0.84)−1.96 (−5.45 to 1.53)−1.21 (−2.48 to 0.06)−1.36 (−3.83 to 1.11)−1.02 (−2.04 to 0)
     Some postsecondary0.39 (−0.29 to 1.07)−0.43 (−1.52 to 0.66)1.15 (0.37 to 1.93)−2.92 (−6.37 to 0.53)−2.65 (−7.98 to 2.68)−2.79 (−7.02 to 1.44)−0.95 (−2.38 to 0.48)−1.40 (−4.22 to 1.42)−0.46 (−1.69 to 0.77)
     Bachelor’s degree or higher−0.37 (−0.86 to 0.12)−0.60 (−1.49 to 0.29)−0.14 (−0.60 to 0.32)−2.01 (−4.52 to 0.50)−1.27 (−5.21 to 2.67)−2.54 (−5.56 to 0.48)−0.31 (−1.56 to 0.94)−0.30 (−2.91 to 2.3)−0.26 (−1.04 to 0.52)
    Employment status (Ref: employed)
     Unemployed0.45 (0.14 to 0.76)0.30 (−0.13 to 0.74)0.62 (0.22 to 1.02)0.02 (−1.53 to 1.57)−0.09 (−2.42 to 2.24)−0.14 (−2.22 to 1.94)0.15 (−0.61 to 0.91)−0.41 (−1.78 to 0.96)0.6 (−0.13 to 1.33)
     Other employment status1.69 (1.15 to 2.22)1.81 (1.01 to 2.6)1.66 (0.95 to 2.38)−1.73 (−4.69 to 1.23)−2.87 (−7.08 to 1.34)−0.49 (−4.51 to 3.53)−0.15 (−1.50 to 1.20)−0.87 (−3.44 to 1.70)0.54 (−0.55 to 1.64)
    Homeownership (Ref: owner)
     Renter0.62 (0.28 to 0.96)0.66 (0.20 to 1.12)0.58 (0.09 to 1.06)2.62 (1.11 to 4.13)3.51 (1.24 to 5.78)1.57 (−0.45 to 3.59)0.46 (−0.25 to 1.17)0.74 (−0.36 to 1.84)0.17 (−0.75 to 1.09)
    Household arrangement (Ref: single person)
     Couple with no child−0.10 (−0.65 to 0.45)−0.03 (−0.86 to 0.80)−0.17 (−0.89 to 0.56)−2.87 (−5.56 to −0.18)−2.67 (−6.20 to 0.86)−2.86 (−6.72 to 1.00)−1.41 (−2.64 to −0.18)−1.74 (−3.39 to −0.09)−1.08 (−2.65 to 0.49)
     Couple with a child or children < 25 yr−0.43 (−0.98 to 0.12)−0.71 (−1.51 to 0.10)−0.10 (−0.86 to 0.65)−3.85 (−6.57 to −1.13)−3.32 (−6.99 to 0.35)−4.14 (−7.98 to −0.30)−1.59 (−2.82 to −0.36)−1.58 (−3.54 to 0.38)−1.50 (−2.93 to −0.07)
     Separated with a child or children < 25 yr0 (−0.65 to 0.65)−0.06 (−0.90 to 0.79)0.13 (−0.84 to 1.11)−2.09 (−5.05 to 0.87)−0.74 (−4.80 to 3.32)−4.37 (−8.49 to −0.25)−0.71 (−1.77 to 0.35)−0.08 (−1.71 to 1.55)−1.67 (−3.2 to −0.14)
     Other household compositions0.70 (0.21 to 1.19)0.57 (−0.07 to 1.21)0.92 (0.15 to 1.68)−2.20 (−4.02 to −0.38)−2.43 (−5.33 to 0.47)−1.90 (−4.17 to 0.37)−0.96 (−1.78 to −0.14)−1.16 (−2.73 to 0.41)−0.70 (−1.48 to 0.08)
    Geographical factors
    Urbanicity (Ref: rural)
     Urban0.06 (−0.28 to 0.39)0.03 (−0.46 to 0.52)0.11 (−0.33 to 0.54)1.11 (−0.60 to 2.82)0.01 (−2.52 to 2.54)2.25 (0.09 to 4.41)0.49 (−0.37 to 1.35)0.47 (−1.00 to 1.94)0.45 (−0.33 to 1.23)
    Geographic region (Ref: Ontario)
     Atlantic†−0.17 (−0.53 to 0.18)−0.01 (−0.54 to 0.53)−0.34 (−0.78 to 0.11)−0.59 (−2.45 to 1.27)−2.05 (−4.89 to 0.79)0.76 (−1.61 to 3.13)−0.19 (−0.99 to 0.61)−0.81 (−2.12 to 0.5)0.34 (−0.52 to 1.20)
     Quebec−0.09 (−0.45 to 0.27)0.38 (−0.19 to 0.94)−0.58 (−1.02 to −0.13)1.12 (−0.92 to 3.16)−0.26 (−3.34 to 2.82)2.51 (−0.04 to 5.06)0.86 (−0.16 to 1.88)0.75 (−0.97 to 2.47)0.91 (0.08 to 1.74)
     Prairie†0.13 (−0.22 to 0.47)0.17 (−0.34 to 0.68)0.10 (−0.37 to 0.57)1.76 (0.07 to 3.45)0.27 (−2.14 to 2.68)3.13 (0.80 to 5.46)0.71 (−0.11 to 1.53)−0.09 (−1.19 to 1.01)1.31 (0.21 to 2.41)
     British Columbia−0.13 (−0.51 to 0.25)0.02 (−0.53 to 0.58)−0.25 (−0.76 to 0.26)1.91 (−0.05 to 3.87)1.52 (−1.34 to 4.38)2.21 (−0.53 to 4.95)0.46 (−0.52 to 1.44)0.24 (−1.21 to 1.69)0.63 (−0.35 to 1.61)
    Constant15.6 (13.19 to 18.01)17.47 (13.94 to 21)13.18 (10 to 16.36)
    Observations18 30010 049825118 30010 049825118 30010 0498251
    • Note: Ref. = reference category in the ordinary least squares and logistic model estimations.

    • ↵* Coefficients and marginal effects are calculated at the means of the independent variables. Marginal effects are multiplied by 100 for ease of readability; 95% confidence intervals are presented in parentheses.

    • ↵† Atlantic includes the provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick; Prairie includes the provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Decomposition of the differences in psychological distress scale and the prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide plan between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada*

    VariablePsychological distress scaleLifetime suicidal ideationLifetime suicide plan
    TotalWomenMenTotalWomenMenTotalWomenMen
    Differences explained by characteristics†
     Sex0.01040.00020.0002
     Age−0.3250−0.4360−0.2150−0.0079−0.0082−0.0071−0.0016−0.0002−0.0030
     Marital status0.00020.0244−0.0146−0.00010.0005−0.0003−0.0002−0.0001−0.0001
     Income−0.1320−0.1320−0.1330−0.0025−0.0027−0.0026−0.0011−0.0016−0.0008
     Education−0.0230−0.0247−0.0053−0.0023−0.0003−0.0034−0.00070.0001−0.0010
     Employment status−0.00230.0687−0.0745−0.0001−0.00160.00010.0000−0.0003−0.0011
     Home ownership−0.0676−0.0816−0.0542−0.0036−0.0056−0.0022−0.0008−0.0018−0.0004
     Household arrangement−0.0304−0.0820−0.03310.0008−0.00030.00110.0000−0.00040.0001
     Urbanicity−0.0002−0.0001−0.0007−0.00010.0000−0.0003−0.00010.0000−0.0001
     Geographic region−0.02510.0443−0.1070−0.0022−0.0028−0.0001−0.00020.0014−0.0004
    –Sum explained−0.5950‡−0.6190‡−0.6370‡−0.0179‡−0.0209‡−0.0149‡−0.0042‡−0.0030−0.0068§
    Differences not explained by the characteristics (sum unexplained)−0.3970−0.5890−0.1770−0.0577‡−0.0730‡−0.0441§−0.0404‡−0.0477‡−0.0329§
    Differences: non-Indigenous−Indigenous−0.992‡−1.208‡−0.814§−0.0757‡−0.0939‡−0.0590‡−0.0448‡−0.0507‡−0.0396‡
    • ↵* Detailed results of decomposition analyses can be found in Appendices 4, 5 and 6 (available at www.cmajopen.ca/content/9/1/E215/suppl/DC1).

    • ↵† Negative (positive) value for each characteristic indicates the absolute value of the difference that could have been reduced (increased) if that characteristic for the Indigenous population were made to be identical to that of the non-Indigenous population. For example, if the annual equivalized income for Indigenous adults increased to the level of the non-Indigenous population, the difference in the psychological distress scale between the 2 groups could have been decreased by 0.1320 points.

    • ↵‡ p < 0.01.

    • ↵§ p < 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 9 (1)
Vol. 9, Issue 1
1 Jan 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Explaining the gaps in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada: a cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Explaining the gaps in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada: a cross-sectional study
Mohammad Hajizadeh, Min Hu, Yukiko Asada, Amy Bombay
Jan 2021, 9 (1) E215-E223; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200177

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Explaining the gaps in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours between non-Indigenous and Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada: a cross-sectional study
Mohammad Hajizadeh, Min Hu, Yukiko Asada, Amy Bombay
Jan 2021, 9 (1) E215-E223; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200177
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A qualitative exploration of Indigenous patients experiences of racism and perspectives on improving cultural safety within health care
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Indigenous Health
    • Mental health
    • Psychiatry
      • Mood disorders (including depression)
      • Suicide
      • Other psychiatry

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire