Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review

Brandyn D. Lau, Patrick Murphy, Anthony J. Nastasi, Stella Seal, Peggy S. Kraus, Deborah B. Hobson, Dauryne L. Shaffer, Christine G. Holzmueller, Jonathan K. Aboagye, Michael B. Streiff and Elliott R. Haut
December 08, 2020 8 (4) E832-E843; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200003
Brandyn D. Lau
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Murphy
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MD MPH MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony J. Nastasi
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MHS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stella Seal
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MLS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peggy S. Kraus
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah B. Hobson
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MSN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dauryne L. Shaffer
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MSN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine G. Holzmueller
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan K. Aboagye
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MBChB MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael B. Streiff
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliott R. Haut
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (Lau), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (Lau, Holzmueller, Streiff), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; Department of Surgery (Murphy), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. and Department of Surgery, Indiana University, (Murphy; during the conduct of the study); School of Medicine (Nastasi), Stanford University, Li Ka Shing Building, Stanford, Calif.; Welch Medical Library (Seal), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Pharmacy (Kraus), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Acute Care Surgery (Hobson, Aboagye, Haut), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University; Department of Nursing (Hobson), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Department of Nursing (Shaffer), Johns Hopkins Hospital; Division of Hematology (Streiff), Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (Haut), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Selection process for studies describing ambulation as a therapy for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospitals. Note: ICU = intensive care unit, VTE = venous thromboembolism.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of included studies of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism

    StudyYearCountryStudy designPatient populationGroupsnMale no. (%)Age, yr; mean ± SD
    Miller et al (39)1976USRCTMedicine (acute MI and heart failure)Early ambulation21NRNR
    Bed rest8NRNR
    Prerovský et al (40)1988AmsterdamRCTMedicine (acute MI)Active foot flexion135109 (81)59 ± 9
    Heparin133101 (76)58 ± 9
    Control140109 (78)59 ± 8
    Vioreanu et al (41)2007IrelandRCTOrthopedics (foot and ankle)Cast immobilization2920 (69)35 ± 16
    Early ambulation3321 (64)37 ± 13
    Sorbello et al (42)2009AustraliaRCTMedicine (stroke)Standard of care3316 (48)75 ± 10
    Early mobilization3822 (58)75 ± 15
    Amin et al (46)2010FranceSecondary analysis of RCTMedicineAmbulatory607317 (52)72 ± 11
    Nonambulatory447226 (47)75 ± 10
    Wang et al (43)2016ChinaRCTOrthopedicsControl7865 (83)54 ± 6
    Active ankle movements9678 (81)52 ± 7
    de Almeida et al (44)2017ItalyRCTGeneral surgeryControl5422 (41)62 (51–68)*
    Early mobilization5421 (39)61 (53–70)*
    Guo et al (45)2019ChinaRCTGynecology (surgical oncology)Control530 (0)52 ± 13
    Functional exercises620 (0)48 ± 11
    Lassen and Borris (29)1991DenmarkProspective cohortOrthopedics (THA)POD #4 mobilization (Gr1)35NRNR
    POD #9 mobilization (Gr2)16NRNR
    Gr2 mobilization to POD #419NRNR
    Karic et al (30)2017NorwayProspective cohortNeurosurgery (aneurysmal repair)Control7728 (36)54 (25–79)*
    Early mobilization9428 (30)57 (25–81)*
    Moses (32)1951USRetrospective cohortSurgeryControl74NRNR
    Bicycle exercise74NRNR
    Flanc et al (33)1969EnglandRetrospective cohortSurgeryControl65NRNR
    Supervised exercise67NRNR
    Pearse et al (34)2007USRetrospective cohortOrthopedics (TKA)Early mobilization9754 (56)69 (SD NR)
    Control9848 (49)69 (SD NR)
    Chandrasekaran et al (35)2009AustraliaRetrospective cohortOrthopedics (TKA)Before ambulation protocol5021 (42)73 (SD NR)
    After ambulation protocol5024 (48)71 (SD NR)
    Frantzides et al (36)2012USRetrospective cohortGeneral surgery (bypass)Ambulation protocol1257NRNR
    Heparin protocol435NRNR
    Cassidy et al (37)2014USRetrospective cohort (NSQIP)SurgeryBefore VTE protocol1569NRNR
    After VTE QI protocol1323NRNR
    Bhatt et al (31)2017IrelandRetrospective cohortGeneral surgeryControl3018 (60)61 ± 15
    Exercise program3017 (57)61 ± 14
    Silver et al (38)2020USRetrospective cohortMedical (ischemic stroke)Control (24 h bed rest)20397 (52)72 ± 16
    12 h bed rest18987 (46)72 ± 16
    • Note: Gr = Grade of mobilization, MI = myocardial infarction, NR = not reported, NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, POD = postoperative day, QI = quality improvement, RCT = randomized controlled trial, SD = standard deviation, THA = total hip arthroplasty, TKA = total knee arthroplasty, VTE = venous thromboembolism.

    • ↵* Median (interquartile range).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Results of included studies of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism

    StudyAmbulatory group descriptionAmbulation quantified?Comparison group descriptionPharmacological VTE prophylaxisOutcome (definition)Group sizesResultsStudy conclusion
    Miller et al (39)Sitting and standing at the bedside for 30 min 3 times/d; ate meals while sittingNoFive days of bed rest with leg exercises hourlyNoDVT (125I-fibrinogen)21Amb10%Early mobilization program reduces the incidence of venous thrombosis in acute MI
    8Control63%
    Prerovský et al (40)Dorsal and plantar flexion for 1–2 min every hour while awakeNoStandard of care without chemical VTE prophylaxisNo*DVT (125I-fibrinogen)135Amb5.2%Moderate lower limb exercise is the simplest measure to prevent VTE
    133Heparin9.0%
    140Control13.6%
    Vioreanu et al (41)Custom made removable fiberglass cast with ankle exercises 3 times/d for 10 minNoNon-removable fiberglass cast for 6 weeksNRVTE29Amb0%Postoperative immobilization may increase DVT risk
    Clinical33Control6%
    Sorbello et al (42)Sitting or standing within 24 h for 6 d with aid of nurse or physiotherapistNoStandard of careNRVTE (NR)33Amb0%No difference in complications after initiation of early mobilization
    38Control0%
    Amin et al (46)Ability to attain autonomous walking distance > 10 mYesDid not attain autonomous walking > 10 mYes†VTE (clinical)607Amb8.4%‡In the prevention of VTE, reaching ambulatory status may not be a reason for stopping pharmacological prophylaxis
    447Control16.2%
    Wang et al (43)Dorsal and plantar flexion 30 times/min, 20 times/d in first 7 postoperative daysNoStandard of careNRDVT (doppler or clinical)78Amb7.6%Significant reduction in all DVTs but no difference in symptomatic DVTs (2.2% v. 3.9%)
    96Control18.4%
    de Almeida et al (44)Twice daily exercise program based on patient’s functional abilityYesOnce daily exercise programNRDVT (clinical)54Amb1.8%Primary outcome was ability to walk but no difference in DVT
    54Control0%
    Guo et al (45)Active ankle motions, calf massage and deep breathingNoStandard of careYesDVT (clinical or ultrasonography)53Amb1.9%Because of the sample size limitation, the authors could not draw any conclusion about the effects of exercise on the prevention of VTE
    62Control1.6%
    Lassen and Borris (29)Mobilized from postoperative day 4 onwardNoMobilized from postoperative day 9 onwardYesDVT (phlebography)35Amb21%Patients may lose benefit of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis if they are not mobilized
    35Control75%
    Karic et al (30)Progressive mobilization from HOB elevation to sitting, standing and walking to restroomNoStandard of careYesVTE (clinical)77Amb4.2%No impact on VTE but reduced postoperative vasospasm
    94Control3.8%
    Moses (32)Forced respirations and 2-min bicycle exercise every day or twice daily while awakeNoStandard of careNRVTE (clinical)74Amb0%Bicycle or deep breathing reduce thrombotic complications
    74Control5%
    Flanc et al (33)Supervised exercise 6 times/d with nursing reminders to exerciseNoStandard of careNRDVT (125I-fibrinogen)65Amb25%Strain on hospital resources and only benefit was in older patients
    67Control35%
    Pearse et al (34)VTE prevention protocol including < 24 h mobilizationNoRoutine ambulation on POD #2YesDVT (Doppler)97Amb1%Early mobilization reduces radiographic DVT
    98Control28%
    Chandrasekaran et al (35)Mobilized with first 24 h, at least twice daily, 15–30 min, by physiotherapistsYes (sitting, 1–5 m, > 5 m)Routine out of bed to chair and walking POD #2YesVTE (Doppler or clinical)50Amb16%Early mobilization reduces postoperative DVT, particularly if > 5 m (no VTE in 15 patients)
    50Control38%
    Frantzides et al (36)VTE prevention protocol including ambulation within 2 hNoStandard of care with enoxaparinYes (control only)VTE (NR)1257Amb0.5%Early ambulation as part of a comprehensive protocol obviates need for pharmacological prophylaxis except in high-risk patients
    435Control2.7%
    Cassidy et al (37)New comprehensive VTE prevention protocol including mobilization 3 times/dNoPrior to protocol with no predefined practiceYes (according to risk assessment)VTE (NSQIP)1569Amb3%Postoperative mobilization program, risk stratification and electronic recommendations reduce VTE
    1323Control0.8%
    Bhatt et al (31)Twice daily exercise program with pedal exerciser or POD#2 or when able to sitYesStandard of careNRVTE (clinical)30Amb0%No impact on VTE but reduced infectious complications postoperatively
    30Control0%
    Silver et al (38)Bedrest for = 24 hNoAt least 12 h of bedrestNoDVT (clinical)203Amb0.5%No effect on VTE but reduction in pneumonia and LOS
    189Control1.5%
    • Note: Amb = ambulation, DVT = deep vein thrombosis, HOB = head of bed, LOS = length of stay, MI = myocardial infarction, NR = not reported, NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, POD = postoperative day, RCT = randomized controlled trial, VTE = venous thromboembolism.

    • ↵* Ambulation and Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily had the lowest rate of VTE at 3.3%.

    • ↵† Heparin was used in a third group but not ambulatory or control group.

    • ↵‡ Patients in both groups were randomly assigned to receive placebo, enoxaparin 40 mg or 20 mg once daily.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3:

    Quality of included studies and assessment of bias, as evaluated by Downs and Black (28)

    StudyYearStudy designMeasureScoreOverall quality*
    Quality of reportingExternal validityInternal validityPower
    Moses (32)1951Retrospective cohort21104Poor
    Flanc et al (33)1969Retrospective cohort726014Fair
    Miller et al (39)1976RCT516012Poor
    Prerovský et al (40)1988RCT626014Fair
    Lassen and Borris (29)1991Prospective cohort31408Poor
    Pearse et al (34)2007Retrospective cohort906015Fair
    Vioreanu et al (41)2007RCT736016Fair
    Chandrasekaran et al (35)2009Retrospective cohort818017Fair
    Sorbello et al (42)2009RCT1037020Good
    Amin et al (46)2010Secondary analysis of RCT1139023Good
    Frantzides et al (36)2012Retrospective cohort734014Fair
    Cassidy et al (37)2014Retrospective cohort (NSQIP)838019Good
    Bhatt et al (31)2017Retrospective cohort826016Fair
    Wang et al (43)2016RCT819018Fair
    Karic et al (30)2017Prospective cohort836118Fair
    de Almeida et al (44)2017RCT11311126Excellent
    Guo et al (45)2019RCT11211125Good
    Silver et al (38)2019Retrospective cohort935017Fair
    • Note: NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, RCT = randomized controlled trial.

    • ↵* Scale for quality scores: poor: ≤ 14; fair: 15–19; good: 20–25; excellent: 26–28.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4:

    Results of included studies rated “good” or “excellent” quality

    StudyStudy sizeStudy populationStudy quality*Ambulation quantified?Pharmacological VTE prophylaxisOutcome (definition)ResultsStudy conclusionNotes
    Sorbello et al (42)71MedicineGoodNoNRVTE (NR)Amb0%No difference in complications after initiation of early mobilizationPhysiotherapy-directed OR physiotherapist-directed ambulation early in admission did not change VTE rates compared with standard of care
    Control0%
    Amin et al (46)1054MedicineGoodYesYes†VTE (clinical)Amb8.4%‡In the prevention of VTE, reaching ambulatory status may not be a reason for stopping chemical prophylaxisThe best study to quantify ambulation (> 10 m walking). Reinforces need for chemical VTE prophylaxis
    Control16.2%
    Cassidy et al (37)2892SurgeryGoodNoYes, according to risk assessmentVTE (NSQIP)Amb3%Postoperative mobilization program, risk stratification and electronic recommendations reduce VTELarge study with definition of VTE used widely. Wide implementation of a 3 times/d regimen failed to show a reduction in VTE
    Control0.8%
    de Almeida et al (44)108SurgeryExcellentYesNRDVT (clinical)Amb1.8%Primary outcome was ability to walk but no difference in DVTVTE events were a secondary outcome. More ambulation (≥ 2 times/d compared with ≤ 1 time/d) did not reduce VTE events
    Control0%
    Guo et al (45)115SurgeryGoodNoYesDVT (clinical or ultrasonography)Amb1.6%Because of the sample size limitation, the authors could not draw any conclusion about the effects of exercises on the prevention of VTESimilar to other lower quality studies, ankle exercises do not seem to reduce risk of DVT
    Control1.9%
    • Note: Amb = ambulation, NR = not reported, NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, VTE = venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis [DVT])

    • ↵* Assessed using the Downs and Black tool. (28)

    • ↵† Patients in both groups were randomly assigned to receive placebo or enoxaparin 40 mg or 20 mg once daily.

    • ↵‡ Ambulation and enoxaparin 40 mg once daily had the lowest rate of VTE at 3.3%.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 8 (4)
Vol. 8, Issue 4
1 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review
Brandyn D. Lau, Patrick Murphy, Anthony J. Nastasi, Stella Seal, Peggy S. Kraus, Deborah B. Hobson, Dauryne L. Shaffer, Christine G. Holzmueller, Jonathan K. Aboagye, Michael B. Streiff, Elliott R. Haut
Oct 2020, 8 (4) E832-E843; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review
Brandyn D. Lau, Patrick Murphy, Anthony J. Nastasi, Stella Seal, Peggy S. Kraus, Deborah B. Hobson, Dauryne L. Shaffer, Christine G. Holzmueller, Jonathan K. Aboagye, Michael B. Streiff, Elliott R. Haut
Oct 2020, 8 (4) E832-E843; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Lifestyle
      • Exercise, physical activity
    • Cardiovascular Medicine
      • Venous thromboembolism
      • Other cardiovascular medicine
    • Rehabilitation Medicine
      • Other rehabilitation medicine

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire