Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Incidental detection, imaging modalities and temporal trends of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Todd A. Norwood, Emmalin Buajitti, Lorraine L. Lipscombe, Thérèse A. Stukel and Laura C. Rosella
November 02, 2020 8 (4) E695-E705; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200095
Todd A. Norwood
Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Norwood, Buajitti, Rosella), University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario (Norwood); Women’s College Hospital (Lipscombe); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Lipscombe, Stukel), University of Toronto; ICES Central (Stukel, Rosella), Toronto, Ont.
MSA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emmalin Buajitti
Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Norwood, Buajitti, Rosella), University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario (Norwood); Women’s College Hospital (Lipscombe); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Lipscombe, Stukel), University of Toronto; ICES Central (Stukel, Rosella), Toronto, Ont.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorraine L. Lipscombe
Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Norwood, Buajitti, Rosella), University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario (Norwood); Women’s College Hospital (Lipscombe); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Lipscombe, Stukel), University of Toronto; ICES Central (Stukel, Rosella), Toronto, Ont.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thérèse A. Stukel
Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Norwood, Buajitti, Rosella), University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario (Norwood); Women’s College Hospital (Lipscombe); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Lipscombe, Stukel), University of Toronto; ICES Central (Stukel, Rosella), Toronto, Ont.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura C. Rosella
Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Norwood, Buajitti, Rosella), University of Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario (Norwood); Women’s College Hospital (Lipscombe); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Lipscombe, Stukel), University of Toronto; ICES Central (Stukel, Rosella), Toronto, Ont.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Differentiated thyroid cancer age-standardized incidence rates (per 100 000 person-years) by sex and incidentally detected status, 1998–2017. Restricted to patients aged 15 to 84 years at diagnosis. Rates are age-standardized to people registered with an Ontario health card (Registered Persons Database). The shaded bands indicate the 95% confidence intervals for the rates. (A) Female age-standardized rates by incidentally detected status. (B) Male age-standardized rates by incidentally detected status.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Differentiated thyroid cancer age-specific rates (per 100 000 person-years) by birth cohort and sex for nonincidentally detected cases (panels A and B) and incidentally detected cases (panels C and D). Restricted to patients aged 15 to 84 years at diagnosis. These descriptive results do not disentangle potential age, diagnosis period or birth cohort effects. (A) Female age-specific rates by birth cohort, nonincidentally detected cases. (B) Male age-specific rates by birth cohort, nonincidentally detected cases. (C) Female age-specific rates by birth cohort, incidentally detected cases. (D) Male age-specific rates by birth cohort, incidentally detected cases.

  • Figure 3:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3:

    Differentiated thyroid cancer age-specific rates (per 100 000 person-years) by diagnosis period and sex for nonincidentally detected cases (panels A and B) and incidentally detected cases (panels C and D). Restricted to patients aged 15 to 84 years at diagnosis. These descriptive results do not disentangle potential age, diagnosis period or birth cohort effects. (A) Female age-specific rates by diagnosis period, nonincidentally detected cases. (B) Male age-specific rates by diagnosis period, nonincidentally detected cases. (C) Female age-specific rates by diagnosis period, incidentally detected cases. (D) Male age-specific rates by diagnosis period, incidentally detected cases.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (n = 36 531) by sex and pathway to diagnosis (incidentally detected v. nonincidentally detected), Ontario, 1998–2017*†

    CharacteristicFemale patients
    n = 28 735; 78.7% of patients
    Male patients
    n = 7796; 21.3% of patients
    Incidentally detected; no. (%)‡Nonincidentally detected; no. (%)‡Incidentally detected; no. (%)‡Nonincidentally detected; no. (%)‡
    Total2680 (9.3)26 055 (90.7)1314 (16.9)6482 (83.1)
    Age, yr
     15–29170 (6.3)2596 (10.0)67 (5.1)540 (8.3)
     30–49954 (35.6)12 563 (48.2)406 (30.9)2627 (40.5)
     50–691166 (43.5)9288 (35.6)623 (47.4)2755 (42.5)
     70–84390 (14.6)1608 (6.1)218 (16.6)560 (8.6)
     Mean ± SD52.7 ± 15.047.0 ± 13.754.7 ± 14.549.7 ± 14.0
    Diagnosis period
     1998–2002247 (9.2)3301 (12.6)128 (9.7)818 (12.6)
     2003–2007494 (18.4)5599 (21.4)232 (17.6)1261 (19.4)
     2008–2012843 (31.4)8271 (31.7)405 (30.8)1941 (29.9)
     2013–20171096 (40.9)8884 (34.1)549 (41.7)2462 (38.0)
    Birth cohort
     1913–19227 (0.2)26 (0.1)–**12 (0.2)
     1918–192724 (0.9)98 (0.3)16 (1.2)38 (0.6)
     1923–193274 (2.7)255 (1.0)44 (3.3)90 (1.4)
     1928–1937120 (4.4)516 (2.0)71 (5.4)191 (2.9)
     1933–1942181 (6.7)899 (3.4)83 (6.3)282 (4.3)
     1938–1947215 (8.0)1366 (5.2)123 (9.3)451 (6.9)
     1943–1952288 (10.7)2086 (8.0)173 (13.1)655 (10.1)
     1948–1957284 (10.6)2707 (10.4)164 (12.4)765 (11.8)
     1953–1962330 (12.3)3358 (12.9)146 (11.1)833 (12.8)
     1958–1967327 (12.2)3816 (14.6)145 (11.0)879 (13.5)
     1963–1972281 (10.5)3379 (12.9)112 (8.5)751 (11.6)
     1968–1977202 (7.5)2832 (10.8)101 (7.6)564 (8.7)
     1973–1982144 (5.3)2104 (8.0)59 (4.5)422 (6.5)
     1978–1987108 (4.0)1434 (5.5)36 (2.7)272 (4.2)
     1983–199262 (2.3)723 (2.7)21 (1.6)170 (2.6)
     1988–199724 (0.9)352 (1.3)15 (1.1)81 (1.2)
     1993–20029 (0.3)104 (0.4)–**26 (0.4)
    Alive2428 (90.6)25 162 (96.5)1094 (83.2)6035 (93.1)
    Histologically confirmed2598 (96.9)25 325 (97.2)1279 (97.3)6321 (97.5)
    Thyroid biopsy ≤ 6 mo before diagnosis date§1609 (60.0)16 813 (64.5)765 (58.2)4220 (65.1)
    Imaging modality¶
     CT1760 (65.6)NA960 (73.0)NA
     Carotid ultrasonography275 (10.2)NA115 (8.7)NA
     MRI290 (10.8)NA95 (7.2)NA
     SPECT355 (13.2)NA140 (10.6)NA
    • Note: CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, NA = not applicable, SD = standard deviation, SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography.

    • ↵* Incidentally detected status using a 3-month look-back period from patient index date (see main text).

    • ↵† For each sex, except for histologic confirmation, characteristics differed significantly by incidentally detected status (χ2 test for categorical variables; t test for continuous variables; p < 0.001). The proportion of histologically confirmed cases did not vary by incidentally detected status (p > 0.990 for females and males).

    • ↵‡ Unless stated otherwise.

    • ↵§ Includes thyroid gland core biopsy, fine-needle aspiration biopsy and aspiration procedures (Ontario Health Insurance Plan fee codes Z727, Z771 and Z726, respectively).

    • ↵¶ Positron emission tomography not shown because of few cases and thus values were randomly rounded to multiples of 5 to obscure back-calculation of those cases. Therefore, the modality strata do not total the counts by age group because of the rounding. Subtracting the counts by imaging modality strata from those by age group does not provide the actual counts for positron emission tomography–associated incidentally detected cases.

    • ↵** Value suppressed owing to small sample size.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2:

    Sex-specific model coefficients for differentiated thyroid cancer rates by incidentally detected status, 1998–2017*

    CovariateFemale patients; rate ratio (95% CI)
    n = 28 735
    Male patients; rate ratio (95% CI)
    n = 7796
    Nonincidentally detected†
    n = 26 055
    Incidentally detected
    n = 2680
    Nonincidentally detected
    n = 6482
    Incidentally detected
    n = 1314
    Age group, yr
     15–190.23 (0.04–1.22)0.09 (0.06–0.14)0.11 (0.09–0.14)0.06 (0.03–0.12)
     20–240.44 (0.10–1.83)0.17 (0.13–0.23)0.22 (0.19–0.26)0.13 (0.08–0.21)
     25–290.68 (0.21–2.25)0.31 (0.25–0.39)0.38 (0.34–0.44)0.26 (0.19–0.37)
     30–340.90 (0.35–2.33)0.51 (0.42–0.61)0.53 (0.47–0.59)0.38 (0.28–0.52)
     35–391.01 (0.49–2.07)0.64 (0.54–0.76)0.77 (0.70–0.86)0.55 (0.43–0.71)
     40–441.02 (0.63–1.65)0.77 (0.65–0.90)0.87 (0.79–0.96)0.69 (0.54–0.87)
     45–491.03 (0.80–1.31)0.89 (0.76–1.03)0.91 (0.82–1.00)0.83 (0.66–1.04)
     50–54ReferentReferentReferentReferent
     55–590.87 (0.68–1.11)1.01 (0.86–1.18)1.06 (0.96–1.17)1.06 (0.85–1.32)
     60–640.75 (0.46–1.21)1.13 (0.96–1.32)1.12 (1.01–1.23)1.23 (0.99–1.54)
     65–690.62 (0.30–1.27)1.14 (0.97–1.35)0.90 (0.81–1.01)1.61 (1.29–2.00)
     70–740.54 (0.21–1.41)0.97 (0.81–1.17)0.86 (0.76–0.98)1.45 (1.14–1.85)
     75–790.36 (0.11–1.18)1.00 (0.82–1.22)0.56 (0.47–0.66)1.23 (0.93–1.62)
     80–840.19 (0.05–0.80)0.82 (0.65–1.03)0.37 (0.29–0.46)1.04 (0.74–1.47)
    Diagnosis period
     1998–2002ReferentReferentReferentReferent
     2003–20071.60 (1.26–2.04)1.80 (1.55–2.10)1.39 (1.27–1.52)1.62 (1.30–2.01)
     2008–20122.35 (1.46–3.77)2.88 (2.50–3.32)2.03 (1.87–2.20)2.62 (2.14–3.19)
     2013–20172.49 (1.22–5.08)3.45 (3.00–3.96)2.38 (2.20–2.58)3.21 (2.65–3.90)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval.

    • ↵* Estimates are for the 3-month look-back period; Appendix 3 (Supplementary Tables 1–4; available at www.cmajopen.ca/content/8/4/E695/suppl/DC1) provides estimates for each look-back period.

    • ↵† Female nonincidentally detected statistical model includes birth cohort parameter estimates, which are nonsignificant owing to the constraint imposed (birth cohort parameter 1918–1927 = 1923–1932). Complete coefficients are provided in Appendix 3 (Supplementary Table 1).

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3:

    Sex-specific model coefficients for rates of incidentally detected differentiated thyroid cancer by imaging modality, 1998–2017*

    CovariateFemale patients; rate ratio (95% CI)
    n = 2680†
    Male patients; rate ratio (95% CI)
    n = 1314†
    Imaging modality
     CTReferentReferent
     Carotid ultrasonography0.15 (0.10–0.23)0.19 (0.12–0.32)
     MRI0.08 (0.05–0.14)0.02 (0.01–0.09)
     SPECT0.16 (0.11–0.24)0.15 (0.08–0.26)
    Age group, yr
     15–190.09 (0.06–0.14)0.06 (0.03–0.12)
     20–240.17 (0.13–0.23)0.13 (0.08–0.21)
     25–290.31 (0.25–0.39)0.26 (0.19–0.37)
     30–340.50 (0.42–0.61)0.38 (0.28–0.52)
     35–390.64 (0.54–0.76)0.55 (0.43–0.71)
     40–440.77 (0.65–0.90)0.69 (0.54–0.87)
     45–490.89 (0.76–1.03)0.83 (0.66–1.04)
     50–54ReferentReferent
     55–591.01 (0.86–1.18)1.06 (0.85–1.32)
     60–641.13 (0.96–1.32)1.23 (0.99–1.54)
     65–691.14 (0.97–1.35)1.60 (1.28–1.99)
     70–740.97 (0.81–1.17)1.46 (1.14–1.85)
     75–791.00 (0.82–1.22)1.23 (0.93–1.62)
     80–840.82 (0.65–1.03)1.04 (0.74–1.47)
    Diagnosis period
     1998–2002ReferentReferent
     2003–20071.56 (1.30–1.88)1.53 (1.18–1.97)
     2008–20122.61 (2.20–3.09)2.59 (2.05–3.26)
     2013–20173.20 (2.71–3.77)3.31 (2.64–4.14)
    Modality (period)‡
     Carotid ultrasonography (2003–2007)§1.26 (0.77–2.07)0.62 (0.31–1.23)
     Carotid ultrasonography (2008–2012)§1.07 (0.67–1.69)0.53 (0.28–1.00)
     Carotid ultrasonography (2013–2017)§0.89 (0.56–1.40)0.59 (0.33–1.06)
     MRI (2003–2007)§1.97 (1.07–3.60)5.25 (1.19–23.15)
     MRI (2008–2012)§2.20 (1.25–3.88)4.64 (1.09–19.80)
     MRI (2013–2017)§1.99 (1.14–3.49)5.21 (1.24–21.84)
     SPECT (2003–2007)§1.61 (1.01–2.58)1.42 (0.72–2.78)
     SPECT (2008–2012)§1.21 (0.77–1.90)1.19 (0.63–2.24)
     SPECT (2013–2017)§1.24 (0.80–1.92)0.65 (0.34–1.24)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography.

    • ↵* Estimates are for the 3-month look-back period; Appendix 3 (Supplementary Tables 5–6; available at www.cmajopen.ca/content/8/4/E695/suppl/DC1) provides estimates for each look-back period.

    • ↵† Total incidentally detected cases shown to obscure back-calculation of positron emission tomography–associated cases, which were excluded from imaging-specific models because of few cases.

    • ↵‡ Denotes a statistical interaction term among the covariates.

    • ↵§ Denotes the statistical interaction estimate among the covariate categories.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 8 (4)
Vol. 8, Issue 4
1 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidental detection, imaging modalities and temporal trends of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Incidental detection, imaging modalities and temporal trends of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study
Todd A. Norwood, Emmalin Buajitti, Lorraine L. Lipscombe, Thérèse A. Stukel, Laura C. Rosella
Oct 2020, 8 (4) E695-E705; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200095

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Incidental detection, imaging modalities and temporal trends of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study
Todd A. Norwood, Emmalin Buajitti, Lorraine L. Lipscombe, Thérèse A. Stukel, Laura C. Rosella
Oct 2020, 8 (4) E695-E705; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200095
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Evidence-based Medicine
      • Diagnostic tests
    • Ear, Nose & Throat
    • Oncology
      • Other cancers
    • Radiology
      • Radiological diagnosis

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire