Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research

Patient and primary care physician characteristics associated with billing incentives for chronic diseases in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study

Kimberlyn McGrail, M. Ruth Lavergne, Megan Ahuja, Seles Yung and Sandra Peterson
May 05, 2020 8 (2) E319-E327; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190054
Kimberlyn McGrail
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Ahuja, Yung, Peterson), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Lavergne), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Ruth Lavergne
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Ahuja, Yung, Peterson), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Lavergne), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Ahuja
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Ahuja, Yung, Peterson), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Lavergne), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seles Yung
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Ahuja, Yung, Peterson), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Lavergne), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Peterson
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Ahuja, Yung, Peterson), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Lavergne), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Proportion of primary care physicians who billed at least 1 chronic care or complex care incentive payment, and proportion of patients who had an incentive billed on their behalf, 2003/04 to 2013/14. Source: British Columbia Medical Services Plan (physician billing) information (15) and author calculations.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Flow diagram showing selection of patient cohort.

  • Figure 3:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3:

    Flow diagram showing selection of physician cohort.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1:

    Summary of incentive programs in British Columbia

    Incentive programEligible patient conditionsAnnual incentive fee, $
    Chronic Disease ManagementDiabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure125*
    Complex Care Planning and Management≥ 2 of the following conditions: diabetes, chronic renal failure, heart failure, chronic respiratory condition, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, chronic neurodegenerative disease, chronic liver disease315
    • Source: British Columbia Medical Services Commission payment schedule November 2010. (14)

    • ↵* The chronic disease management program also included an incentive for hypertension valued at $50. We excluded this incentive because of its lower dollar value and lower complexity of needs of patients who are diagnosed only with hypertension.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2:

    Characteristics of patients who had incentives billed on their behalf in all, some or none of the study years, 2010–2013

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of patients*Standardized difference (no incentive billed v. billed in all 4 yr)
    Overall
    n = 428 770
    No incentive billed in any year
    n = 152 686
    Incentives billed in 1–3 yr
    n = 133 609
    Incentives billed in all 4 yr
    n = 142 475
    Sex
     Female204 832 (47.8)77 014 (50.4)62 402 (46.7)65 416 (45.9)0.09
     Male223 811 (52.2)75 644 (49.5)71 169 (53.3)76 998 (54.0)
     Missing127 (< 0.1)28 (< 0.1)38 (< 0.1)61 (< 0.1)
    Age group, yr
     ≤ 176815 (1.6)6309 (4.1)407 (0.3)99 (0.1)0.66
     18–4435 635 (8.3)23 921 (15.7)8090 (6.1)3624 (2.5)
     45–74258 623 (60.3)91 170 (59.7)86 245 (64.6)81 208 (57.0)
     ≥ 75127 697 (29.8)31 286 (20.5)38 867 (29.1)57 544 (40.4)
    Health authority
     Interior Health75 525 (17.6)24 566 (16.1)22 679 (17.0)28 280 (19.8)0.17
     Fraser Health157 241 (36.7)57 683 (37.8)49 993 (37.4)49 565 (34.8)
     Vancouver Coastal Health96 180 (22.4)38 239 (25.0)28 595 (21.4)29 346 (20.6)
     Vancouver Island Health Authority76 642 (17.9)24 275 (15.9)24 055 (18.0)28 312 (19.9)
     Northern Health22 709 (5.3)7722 (5.1)8133 (6.1)6854 (4.8)
     Missing473 (0.1)201 (0.1)154 (0.1)118 (0.1)
    Income quintile
     Q1 (lowest)94 909 (22.1)33 513 (21.9)29 975 (22.4)31 421 (22.0)0.00
     Q292 858 (21.7)32 973 (21.6)28 935 (21.7)30 950 (21.7)
     Q385 283 (19.9)30 213 (19.8)26 298 (19.7)28 772 (20.2)
     Q479 239 (18.5)28 158 (18.4)24 710 (18.5)26 371 (18.5)
     Q5 (highest)71 983 (16.8)26 168 (17.1)22 136 (16.6)23 679 (16.6)
     Missing4498 (1.0)1661 (1.1)1555 (1.2)1282 (0.9)
    No. of incentive-eligible conditions first yr
     1248 472 (57.9)113 697 (74.5)78 964 (59.1)55 811 (39.2)0.78
     2139 278 (32.5)34 036 (22.3)43 197 (32.3)62 045 (43.5)
     336 868 (8.6)4651 (3.0)10 463 (7.8)21 754 (15.3)
     44152 (1.0)302 (0.2)985 (0.7)2865 (2.0)
    Date of diagnosis of first eligible condition(s)
     201045 768 (10.7)18 937 (12.4)16 703 (12.5)10 128 (7.1)0.29
     1–4 yr prior (2006–2009)165 924 (38.7)66 063 (43.3)51 125 (38.3)48 736 (34.2)
     ≥ 5 yr prior (2005 or earlier)217 078 (50.6)67 686 (44.3)65 781 (49.2)83 611 (58.7)
    Non–fee-for-service encounter
     No305 037 (71.1)108 066 (70.8)96 018 (71.9)100 953 (70.9)−0.00
     Yes123 733 (28.9)44 620 (29.2)37 591 (28.1)41 522 (29.1)
    No. of primary care physician visits over 4-yr study period
     1–613 654 (3.2)10 922 (7.2)2595 (1.9)137 (0.1)0.73
     7–1226 185 (6.1)16 692 (10.9)7936 (5.9)1557 (1.1)
     13–2490 973 (21.2)38 604 (25.3)31 702 (23.7)20 667 (14.5)
     25–48168 835 (39.4)51 541 (33.8)53 039 (39.7)64 255 (45.1)
     > 48129 123 (30.1)34 927 (22.9)38 337 (28.7)55 859 (39.2)
    No. of primary care physicians seen over 4-yr study period
     1–263 259 (14.8)25 431 (16.7)18 064 (13.5)19 764 (13.9)0.08
     3–496 166 (22.4)34 188 (22.4)29 117 (21.8)32 861 (23.1)
     ≥ 5269 345 (62.8)93 067 (61.0)86 428 (64.7)89 850 (63.1)
    Usual provider continuity index, mean ± SD†7.0 ± 2.16.6 ± 2.36.8 ± 2.17.6 ± 1.70.49
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Except where noted otherwise.

    • ↵† Scaled to 1–10.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3:

    Physician and practice characteristics for those who billed incentives in all, some or none of the study years, 2010–2013

    CharacteristicOverall
    n= 3936
    Did not bill incentives in any year
    n = 740
    Billed incentives in 1–3 yr
    n = 571
    Billed incentives in all 4 yr
    n = 2625
    Standardized difference (did not bill v. billed incentives in all 4 yr)
    Total billings (4-yr average), $, mean ± SD228 846.3 ± 128 283.0151 462.6 ± 123 551.6156 760.6 ± 98 024.4266 341.5 ± 118 601.00.95
    No. of patients (4-yr average), mean ± SD1854.4 ± 1056.41742.9 ± 1279.81849.9 ± 1119.21886.8 ± 967.30.13
    % of eligible patients for whom incentives billed (4-yr), mean ± SD21.3 ± 19.9–5.7 ± 7.430.7 ± 17.72.45
    Sex, no. (%)
     Female1417 (36.0)246 (33.2)263 (46.1)908 (34.6)−0.03
     Male2519 (64.0)494 (66.8)308 (53.9)1717 (65.4)
    Age group, yr, no. (%)
     < 35158 (4.0)25 (3.4)49 (8.6)84 (3.2)0.16
     35–44766 (19.5)155 (20.9)153 (26.8)458 (17.4)
     45–541279 (32.5)243 (32.8)141 (24.7)895 (34.1)
     55–641168 (29.7)192 (25.9)123 (21.5)853 (32.5)
     ≥ 65565 (14.4)125 (16.9)105 (18.4)335 (12.8)
    Health authority, no. (%)
     Interior Health755 (19.2)126 (17.0)122 (21.4)507 (19.3)0.17
     Fraser Health1087 (27.6)232 (31.4)142 (24.9)713 (27.2)
     Vancouver Coastal Health1033 (26.2)199 (26.9)159 (27.8)675 (25.7)
     Vancouver Island Health Authority823 (20.9)156 (21.1)120 (21.0)547 (20.8)
     Northern Health212 (5.4)21 (2.8)23 (4.0)168 (6.4)
     Missing26 (0.7)6 (0.8)5 (0.9)15 (0.6)
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4:

    Hierarchical regression model results*

    VariablePoint estimate (95% CI)
    Patient level
    Sex
     Female (reference)
     Male1.42 (1.39–1.45)
    Age group, yr
     ≤ 170.04 (0.03–0.05)
     18–440.24 (0.23–0.26)
     45–740.75 (0.73–0.76)
     ≥ 75 (reference)
    Health authority
     Vancouver Coastal Health (reference)
     Interior Health1.44 (1.26–1.64)
     Fraser Health1.15 (1.10–1.21)
     Vancouver Island Health Authority1.35 (1.17–1.54)
     Northern Health1.68 (1.36–2.06)
    Income quintile
     Q1 (lowest)1.15 (1.11–1.19)
     Q21.12 (1.09–1.16)
     Q31.11 (1.07–1.15)
     Q41.05 (1.02–1.09)
     Q5 (highest) (reference)
    No. of eligible incentives (at start of study period)
     10.33 (0.33–0.34)
     2 (reference)
     32.49 (2.38–2.61)
     45.87 (5.00–6.89)
    Date of diagnosis of first eligible condition(s)
     2010 (reference)
     1–4 yr prior (2006–2009)1.22 (1.18–1.27)
     ≥ 5 yr prior (2005 or earlier)2.01 (1.94–2.08)
    Non–fee-for-service encounter
     Yes0.89 (0.86–0.91)
     No (reference)
    No. of primary care physician contacts
     1–6 (reference)
     7–128.92 (7.39–10.77)
     13–2448.96 (40.86–58.68)
     25–48107.42 (89.59–128.79)
     > 48134.77 (112.27–161.78)
    No. of primary care physicians seen
     1–2 (reference)
     3–40.95 (0.91–0.98)
     ≥ 50.82 (0.78–0.85)
    Usual provider continuity index (continuity of care)1.31 (1.30–1.32)
    Physician level
    Sex
     Female (reference)
     Male0.86 (0.77–0.95)
    Age group, yr
     < 351.44 (1.11–1.88)
     35–441.34 (1.17–1.54)
     45–54 (reference)
     55–640.83 (0.74–0.94)
     ≥ 650.70 (0.60–0.81)
    Health authority
     Vancouver Coastal Health (reference)
     Interior Health1.02 (0.85–1.23)
     Fraser Health1.11 (0.97–1.26)
     Vancouver Island Health Authority1.14 (0.94–1.37)
     Northern Health1.32 (0.99–1.77)
    Total billings1.00 (1.00–1.00)
    No. of patients1.03 (1.02–1.03)
    % of eligible patients for whom incentives billed
     Q1 (reference)
     Q23.14 (2.60–3.80)
     Q314.25 (11.76–17.26)
     Q442.38 (34.55–52.00)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval.

    • ↵* All variables were included in a single model.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 8 (2)
Vol. 8, Issue 2
1 Apr 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient and primary care physician characteristics associated with billing incentives for chronic diseases in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patient and primary care physician characteristics associated with billing incentives for chronic diseases in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study
Kimberlyn McGrail, M. Ruth Lavergne, Megan Ahuja, Seles Yung, Sandra Peterson
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E319-E327; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient and primary care physician characteristics associated with billing incentives for chronic diseases in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study
Kimberlyn McGrail, M. Ruth Lavergne, Megan Ahuja, Seles Yung, Sandra Peterson
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E319-E327; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190054
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Patient characteristics associated with enrolment under voluntary programs implemented within fee-for-service systems in British Columbia and Quebec: a cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Nephrology
    • Geriatric Medicine
      • Other geriatric medicine
    • Family Medicine, General Practice, Primary Care
      • Other family medicine
    • Gastroenterology
      • Liver (including hepatitis and cirrhosis)
    • Respiratory Medicine (Respirology)
      • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Cardiovascular Medicine
      • Ischemic heart disease
      • Heart failure
    • Endocrinology & Metabolism
      • Diabetes
  • Nonclinical
    • Health Policy
      • Other health policy
    • Medical Careers
      • Pay, conditions, numbers

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire