Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009–2010 and 2013–2014)

Elizabeth Nethery, Laura Schummers, K. Suzanne Maginley, Sheila Dunn and Wendy V. Norman
November 04, 2019 7 (4) E646-E653; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190087
Elizabeth Nethery
School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MSc MSM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Schummers
School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
ScD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Suzanne Maginley
School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheila Dunn
School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy V. Norman
School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MD MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • Online appendices

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Appendix 1:Supplemental material
    • Reviewer comments
    • Original submission
    • STROBE statement

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 7 (4)
Vol. 7, Issue 4
1 Oct 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009–2010 and 2013–2014)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009–2010 and 2013–2014)
Elizabeth Nethery, Laura Schummers, K. Suzanne Maginley, Sheila Dunn, Wendy V. Norman
Oct 2019, 7 (4) E646-E653; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190087

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009–2010 and 2013–2014)
Elizabeth Nethery, Laura Schummers, K. Suzanne Maginley, Sheila Dunn, Wendy V. Norman
Oct 2019, 7 (4) E646-E653; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190087
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of universal no-cost coverage on use of long-acting reversible contraception and all prescription contraception: population based, controlled, interrupted time series analysis
  • Can youth-engaged research facilitate equitable access to contraception in Canada? The qualitative study protocol for the Ask Us project
  • Time trends in contraceptive prescribing in UK primary care 2000-2018: a repeated cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Pediatrics
      • Adolescents
    • Sexual Medicine
      • Family planning, contraception
    • Obstetrics & Gynecology
      • Pregnancy
  • Nonclinical
    • Epidemiology
      • Socioeconomic determinants of health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire