Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research

Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods

Russell Eric Dawe, Jessica Bishop, Amanda Pendergast, Susan Avery, Kelly Monaghan, Norah Duggan and Kris Aubrey-Bassler
December 12, 2017 5 (4) E823-E829; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20170081
Russell Eric Dawe
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
MDivMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Bishop
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
MScMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Pendergast
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
BSc(Hons)MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Avery
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
BScMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Monaghan
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
PhDMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norah Duggan
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
BMedScMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kris Aubrey-Bassler
Discipline of Family Medicine (Dawe, Bishop, Pendergast, Avery, Monaghan, Duggan, Aubrey-Bassler) and Primary Healthcare Research Unit (Aubrey-Bassler), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
MScMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow diagram showing cohort selection. *Hospitals with fewer than 20 cesarean deliveries performed in women living within their catchment area.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1 Selected characteristics of women who gave birth between Apr. 1, 2006, and Mar. 31, 2009, at all Canadian hospitals except those in Quebec, by delivery provider
    CharacteristicProvider; no. (%) of women*
    Family physician
    n = 217 870
    Obstetrician
    n = 558 429
    Cesarean delivery24 830 (11.4)192 360 (34.4)
    Age, mean ± SD, yr28.2 ± 5.629.6 ± 5.7
    Income, mean ± SD, $26 821 ± 882727 777 ± 9250
    % of women in census subdivision with at least some high school, mean ± SD81.7 ± 14.184.0 ± 12.5
    Urban residence†151 459 (69.5)474 695 (85.0)
    Hospital level
        353 901 (24.7)150 098 (26.9)
        277 640 (35.6)298 269 (53.4)
        185 642 (39.3)110 051 (19.7)
    Prior cesarean delivery11 229 (5.2)89 265 (16.0)
    Type 1 diabetes89 (0.04)1945 (0.3)
    Type 2 diabetes167 (0.1)2201 (0.4)
    Gestational diabetes7280 (3.3)29 059 (5.2)
    Eclampsia96 (0.04)374 (0.1)
    Placental abruption176 (0.1)1111 (0.2)
    Premature rupture of membranes697 (0.3)3660 (0.6)
    Placenta previa362 (0.2)3065 (0.5)
    Genital herpes236 (0.1)848 (0.2)
    Gestational age, mean ± SD, wk39.3 ± 2.038.8 ± 2.3
    Birth weight, mean ± SD, g3463 ± 5013375 ± 582
    Congenital anomaly4658 (2.1)18 779 (3.4)

    *Except where noted otherwise.

    †Census agglomeration or census metropolitan area.

      • View popup
      Table 2: Selected characteristics of the study cohort by quintile of family physician delivery rate at the home hospital, included as variables in logistic regression and instrumental variable analyses
      CharacteristicQuintile of family physician delivery rate; no. (%)*
      1
      n = 148 059
      2
      n = 158 593
      3
      n = 160 518
      4
      n = 151 206
      5
      n = 157 923
      All
      n = 776 299
      Missing data†1766 (1.2)2207 (1.4)2400 (1.5)4726 (3.1)2980 (1.9)14 079 (1.8)
      Predicted cesarean delivery rate, mean ± SD‡28.4 ± 22.728.9 ± 22.727.8 ± 22.427.8 ± 22.627.1 ± 22.728.0 ± 22.7
      Income, mean ± SD, $27 222 ± 858128 601 ± 10 31428 408 ± 917526 604 ± 843826 632 ± 882227 509 ± 9144
      % Aboriginal, mean ± SD3.6 ± 13.92.4 ± 8.85.8 ± 15.25.9 ± 14.410.9 ± 22.75.8 ± 15.9
      Delivery hospital
          Level 313 896 (9.4)39 481 (24.9)60 043 (37.4)53 996 (35.7)36 583 (23.2)203 999 (26.3)
          Annual volume, mean ± SD2626 ± 15483579 ± 16652936 ± 15673462 ± 22602016 ± 19882923 ± 1913
      Delivery provider
          Annual volume, mean ± SD269 ± 131260 ± 151252 ± 210176 ± 15096 ± 103210 ± 167
          Obstetrician141 732 (95.7)144 028 (90.8)133 475 (83.2)90 462 (59.8)48 732 (30.8) 558 429 (71.9)
          Family physician6327 (4.3)14 565 (9.2)27 043 (16.8)60 744 (40.2109 191 (69.1)217 870 (28.1)
          Midwife†5938 (4.0)7621 (4.8)7273 (4.5)5657 (3.7)4743 (3.0)31 232 (4.0)
      Maternal
          Age, mean ± SD, yr29.3 ± 5.730.5 ± 5.529.0 ± 5.629.3 ± 5.728.2 ± 5.729.2 ± 5.7
      % of women in census subdivision with at least some high school, mean ± SD83.0 ± 12.786.5 ± 11.283.4 ± 12.883.5 ± 12.480.2 ± 15.183.3 ± 13.0
          Urban residence128 533 (86.8)147 590 (93.1)136 309 (84.9)118 755 (78.5)94 967 (60.1)626 154 (80.6)
          Cesarean delivery42 010 (28.4)45 214 (28.5)43 585 (27.2)42 212 (27.9)44 169 (28.0)217 190 (28.0)
          Prior cesarean delivery19 454 (13.1)21 011 (13.2)20 084 (12.5)19 472 (12.9)20 473 (13.0)100 494 (12.9)
          Type 1 diabetes429 (0.3)390 (0.2)471 (0.3)373 (0.2)371 (0.2)2034 (0.3)
          Type 2 diabetes409 (0.3)449 (0.3)615 (0.4)404 (0.3)491 (0.3)2368 (0.3)
          Gestational diabetes6595 (4.4)8107 (5.1)6515 (4.0)8775 (5.8)6347 (4.0)36 339 (4.7)
          Eclampsia120 (0.05)89 (0.1)102 (0.1)62 (0.04)97 (0.1)470 (0.1)
      Pregnancy-induced hypertension8430 (5.7)8481 (5.3)10 381 (6.5)9292 (6.1)10 046 (6.4)46 630 (6.0)
          HIV-positive76 (0.05)81 (0.05)100 (0.1)118 (0.1)63 (0.04)438 (0.05)
          Placental abruption185 (0.1)166 (0.1)469 (0.3)250 (0.2)217 (0.1)1287 (0.2)
      Premature rupture of membranes414 (0.3)387 (0.2)2143 (1.3)939 (0.6)474 (0.3)4357 (0.6)
      Neonatal
          Male sex75 785 (51.2)81 326 (51.3)82 248 (51.2)77 872 (51.5)80 902 (51.2)398 133 (51.3)
      Gestational age, mean ± SD, wk38.9 ± 2.238.9 ± 2.038.9 ± 2.438.9 ± 2.139.1 ± 2.538.9 ± 2.2
          Birth weight, mean ± SD, g3382 ± 5663360 ± 5573417 ± 5673393 ± 5563443 ± 5573399 ± 562
          Congenital anomaly4423 (3.0)4502 (2.8)5227 (3.2)4906 (3.2)4379 (2.8)23 437 (3.0)
          Perinatal mortality686 (0.5)700 (0.4)597 (0.4)628 (0.4)600 (0.4)3211 (0.4)

      *Except where noted otherwise.

      †Records with missing data and deliveries by midwives were excluded from the final analysis.

      ‡Calculated from a logistic regression model including all covariates except for delivery provider.

        • View popup
        Table 3: Relative risk of cesarean delivery, forceps- or vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and all procedural deliveries for family physicians versus obstetricians on logistic and instrumental-variable-adjusted regression
        MethodRR (95% CI)
        Cesarean deliveryForceps- or vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveryAll procedural deliveries
        Logistic regression
            Bivariate0.33 (0.27-0.40)1.02 (0.91-1.13)0.35 (0.31-0.40)
            Multivariate*0.48 (0.41-0.56)1.00 (0.92-1.09)0.61 (0.56-0.67)
        Instrumental-variable-adjusted regression
            Bivariate0.96 (0.79-1.17)0.92 (0.74-1.12)0.94 (0.82-1.09)
            Multivariate*1.27 (1.02-1.57)1.03 (0.82-1.29)1.16 (0.99-1.35)

        Note: CI = confidence interval, RR = relative risk.

        *Multivariate adjusted models controlled for all comorbidities listed in Appendix 1.

        PreviousNext
        Back to top

        In this issue

        CMAJ Open: 5 (4)
        Vol. 5, Issue 4
        21 Dec 2017
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author

        Article tools

        Respond to this article
        Print
        Download PDF
        Article Alerts
        To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
        Email Article

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Citation Tools
        Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods
        Russell Eric Dawe, Jessica Bishop, Amanda Pendergast, Susan Avery, Kelly Monaghan, Norah Duggan, Kris Aubrey-Bassler
        Dec 2017, 5 (4) E823-E829; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170081

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods
        Russell Eric Dawe, Jessica Bishop, Amanda Pendergast, Susan Avery, Kelly Monaghan, Norah Duggan, Kris Aubrey-Bassler
        Dec 2017, 5 (4) E823-E829; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170081
        Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like

        Related Articles

        • PubMed
        • Google Scholar

        Cited By...

        • No citing articles found.
        • Google Scholar

        Similar Articles

        Collections

        • Clinical
          • Health services research
          • Obstetrics & Gynecology
            • Other obstetrics & gynecology
          • Surgery
            • Other surgery
        • Nonclinical
          • Statistics & Research Methods

        Content

        • Current issue
        • Past issues
        • Collections

        About

        • General Information
        • Staff
        • Editorial Board
        • Advisory Panel
        • Contact Us
        • Reprints
        • Copyright and Permissions
        CMAJ Group

        Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

        All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

        To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

        CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

         

         

        Powered by HighWire