Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Informal regionalization of pediatric fracture care in the Greater Toronto Area: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Daniel Pincus, Steven Morrison, Martin F. Gargan and Mark W. Camp
June 15, 2017 5 (2) E468-E475; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160156
Daniel Pincus
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Pincus, Gargan, Camp), Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Pincus); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Pincus), University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children (Morrison, Gargan, Camp), Toronto, Ont.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Morrison
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Pincus, Gargan, Camp), Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Pincus); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Pincus), University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children (Morrison, Gargan, Camp), Toronto, Ont.
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin F. Gargan
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Pincus, Gargan, Camp), Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Pincus); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Pincus), University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children (Morrison, Gargan, Camp), Toronto, Ont.
MA(Oxon)BMBCh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark W. Camp
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Pincus, Gargan, Camp), Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Pincus); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Pincus), University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children (Morrison, Gargan, Camp), Toronto, Ont.
MDMSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow chart showing selection of study patients. GTA = Greater Toronto Area, SCH = supracondylar humerus. Numbers eligible for study inclusion do not equal total numbers less numbers excluded because exclusions were not sequential (there were overlaps between "complicated fracture", "age >14" and "outside GTA").

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Population-standardized number of supracondylar humerus (left) and femur (right) fractures in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), 2008/09 to 2014/15. Number standardized to 2011 GTA population aged 14 years or less. Numbers within regions indicate Local Health Integrated Networks (LHINs). Patients presenting from geographic areas outside the GTA LHINs were excluded from all analyses.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Proportion of supracondylar humerus fractures in 2002 versus 2015 treated at The Hospital for Sick Children, other specialized pediatric centres and community hospitals.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Population-standardized annual incidence rates of uncomplicated supracondylar humerus and femur fractures, 2008/09 to 2014/15, by patient subgroup. Rates standardized to the Greater Toronto Area population aged 14 years or less in 2011.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent surgery at The Hospital for Sick Children for supracondylar humerus fracture
    CharacteristicYear; no. (%) of patients* (n = 945)p value for trend
    2008/09
     (n = 108)
    2009/10
     (n = 113)
    2010/11
     (n = 101)
    2011/12
     (n = 158)
    2012/13
     (n = 150)
    2013/14
     (n = 146)
    2014/15
     (n = 169)
    Missing
    Demographic
    Age, mean ± SD, yr5.44 ± 2.475.20 ± 2.545.66 ± 2.785.35 ± 2.425.53 ± 2.555.51 ± 2.505.43 ± 2.470 (0)0.7
    Female sex56 (51.9)64 (56.6)39 (39.4)68 (43.6)63 (42.0)70 (48.0)86 (50.9)4 (0.4)0.6
    American Society of Anesthesiologists score30 (3.2)0.3
        -186 (86.9)96 (90.6)85 (87.6)136 (88.3)129 (87.8)128 (87.7)154 (92.8)
        -211 (11.1)9 (8.5)11 (11.3)16 (10.4)17 (11.6)16 (11.0)10 (6.0)
        -32 (2.0)1 (0.9)1 (1.0)2 (1.3)1 (0.7)2 (1.4)2 (1.2)
    Presence of any comorbidity0 (0)0 (0)2 (2.0)3 (1.9)07 (4.8)5 (3.0)0 (0)0.007
    Injury
    Gartland type III/IV73 (71.6)67 (60.4)58 (57.4)100 (64.1)89 (59.3)96 (65.8)105 (62.5)11 (1.2)0.6
    Open fracture3 (2.8)1 (0.9)1 (1.0)4 (2.6)2 (1.4)0 (0)2 (1.2)13 (1.4)0.2
    Associated injury3 (2.8)5 (4.4)8 (7.9)4 (2.5)6 (4.0)3 (2.0)4 (2.4)0 (0)0.2
    Preoperative nerve palsy24 (22.2)21 (19.4)17 (17.4)22 (14.5)19 (12.8)18 (12.4)34 (21.0)23 (2.4)0.3
    Compartment syndrome1 (0.9)0 (0)1 (1.02)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.2)14 (1.5)0.8
    Vascular compromise0 (0)0 (0)2 (2.0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)13 (1.4)0.3
    Reoperation (any reason)3 (2.8)0 (0)4 (4.0)2 (1.3)4 (2.7)1 (0.7)4 (2.4)10 (1.0)1.0
    Admission
    Transferred from outside hospital89 (82.4)88 (77.9)72 (71.3)120 (75.9)116 (77.3)118 (80.8)127 (75.1)0 (0)0.6
    Surgery in summer74 (68.5)89 (78.8)75 (74.2)113 (71.5)112 (74.7)102 (69.9)120 (71.0)0 (0)0.6
    Surgery after hours52 (48.1)59 (52.2)50 (49.5)100 (63.3)86 (57.3)74 (50.7)98 (58.0)0 (0)0.2
    Delay to fixation, mean ± SD, h13.73 ±18.4412.74 ± 5.9911.53 ± 6.5413.49 ± 7.5412.39 ± 7.3412.54 ± 6.7111.27 ± 6.2831 (3.3)0.1
    Surgical duration, mean ± SD, min81.40 ± 21.5181.60 ± 30.9586.43 ± 59.7585.13 ± 42.7781.23 ± 32.3578.42 ± 29.9169.98 ± 32.874 (0.4)0.003
    Length of stay, mean ± SD, d1.25 ± 1.081.22 ± 0.411.28 ± 0.701.20 ± 0.401.23 ± 0.431.22 ± 0.471.14 ± 0.484 (0.4)0.2
    Cost of index admission, mean ± SD, $2560 ± 11902306 ± 5072685 ± 9512512 ± 6732529 ± 5992457 ± 5862353 ± 7674 (0.4)0.2

    Note: SD = standard deviation.

    *Except where noted otherwise.

      • View popup
      Table 2: Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for femur fracture
      CharacteristicYear; no. (%) of patients* (n = 421)p value for trend
      2008/09
       (n = 47)
      2009/10
       (n = 49)
      2010/11
      (n = 52)
      2011/12
      (n = 83)
      2012/13
       (n = 55)
      2013/14
      (n = 66)
      2014/15
       (n = 69)
      Missing
      Demographic
      Age, mean ± SD, yr5.19 ± 4.226.00 ± 4.555.65 ± 4.335.61 ± 4.446.80 ± 4.844.73 ± 4.284.97 ± 4.080 (0)0.7
      Female sex14 (29.8)7 (14.3)18 (34.6)20 (24.1)16 (29.1)18 (27.3)15 (21.7)0 (0)0.8
      Presence of any comorbidity0 (0)1 (2.0)0 (0)2 (2.4)2 (3.6)8 (12.1)8 (11.6)0 (0)< 0.001
      Injury
      Fixation (v. spica casting)15 (31.9)24 (49.0)23 (44.2)38 (45.8)30 (54.5)24 (36.4)29 (42.0)0 (0)0.8
      High-energy mechanism46 (97.9)44 (89.8)48 (92.3)81 (97.6)52 (94.5)65 (98.5)69 (100.0)2 (0.5)0.02
      Open fracture1 (2.1)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1.2)1 (1.8)0 (0)1 (1.4)0 (0)1.0
      Associated injury1 (2.1)1 (2.0)0 (0)5 (6.0)2 (3.6)5 (7.6)3 (4.3)0 (0)0.1
      Reoperation (any reason)3 (6.4)11 (22.4)7 (13.5)16 (19.3)11 (20.0)8 (12.1)2 (2.9)0 (0)0.2
      Admission
      Transferred from outside hospital38 (80.8)40 (81.6)46 (88.5)59 (71.1)47 (85.4)48 (72.7)60 (87.0)0 (0)1.0
      Surgery in summer18 (38.3)28 (57.1)29 (55.8)50 (60.2)30 (54.5)35 (53.0)38 (55.1)0 (0)0.3
      Surgery after hours31 (66.0)28 (57.1)31 (59.6)43 (51.8)32 (58.2)33 (50.0)27 (39.1)0 (0)0.005
      Delay to fixation, mean ± SD, h18.72 ± 26.0124.13 ± 58.7015.30 ± 8.5519.77 ± 14.6716.55 ± 12.0415.65 ± 10.5718.68 ± 22.207 (1.6)0.1
      Surgical duration, mean ± SD, min99.13 ± 61.61112.61 ± 57.52104.31 ± 58.65126.99 ± 83.65129.11 ± 76.35107.03 ± 72.1097.14 ± 51.330 (0)0.003
      Length of stay, mean ± SD, d2.57 ± 1.843.08 ± 3.112.29 ± 1.213.00 ± 3.322.29 ±1.242.35 ± 2.502.86 ± 6.390 (0)0.2
      Cost of index admission, mean ± SD, $4152 ± 21934865 ± 39614083 ± 18435541 ± 77284494 ± 20374871 ± 80296139 ± 17 6460 (0)0.2

      Note: SD = standard deviation.

      *Except where noted otherwise.

        • View popup
        Table 3: Adjusted fracture rates*
        Fracture type; variableAdjusted IRR (95% CI)
        Supracondylar humerus
        Overall1.075 (1.072-1.079)
        Transferred1.069 (1.065-1.073)
        Direct presentation1.075 (1.075-1.10)
        Gartland type II1.088 (1.080-1.097)
        Gartland type III1.070 (1.064-1.075)
        Femur
        Overall1.053 (1.044-1.062)
        Transferred1.056 (1.048-1.065)
        Direct presentation1.060 (0.99-1.13)
        Spica casting1.055 (1.037-1.74)
        Fixation1.060 (1.043-1.69)

        Note: CI = confidence interval, IRR = incidence rate ratio.

        *Supracondylar humerus operation rates were adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, patient Local Health Integrated Network (LHIN), Gartland classification, open fracture, presence of preoperative nerve palsy, associated fracture, surgery in summer and after-hours surgery. Femur operation rates were adjusted for age, sex, presence of comorbidity, patient LHIN, injury severity (high/low energy), stabilization method, open fracture, associated fracture, surgery in summer and after-hours surgery.

        PreviousNext
        Back to top

        In this issue

        CMAJ Open: 5 (2)
        Vol. 5, Issue 2
        1 Apr 2017
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author

        Article tools

        Respond to this article
        Print
        Download PDF
        Article Alerts
        To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
        Email Article

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        Informal regionalization of pediatric fracture care in the Greater Toronto Area: a retrospective cross-sectional study
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Citation Tools
        Informal regionalization of pediatric fracture care in the Greater Toronto Area: a retrospective cross-sectional study
        Daniel Pincus, Steven Morrison, Martin F. Gargan, Mark W. Camp
        Apr 2017, 5 (2) E468-E475; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160156

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        Informal regionalization of pediatric fracture care in the Greater Toronto Area: a retrospective cross-sectional study
        Daniel Pincus, Steven Morrison, Martin F. Gargan, Mark W. Camp
        Apr 2017, 5 (2) E468-E475; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160156
        Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like

        Related Articles

        • PubMed
        • Google Scholar

        Cited By...

        • The impact of public health lockdown measures during the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of childrens orthopedic injuries requiring operative intervention
        • Google Scholar

        Similar Articles

        Collections

        • Clinical
          • Pediatrics
            • Children
          • Health services research
          • Surgery
            • Orthopedic & trauma surgery
        • Nonclinical
          • Health Policy
            • Organization of health care

        Content

        • Current issue
        • Past issues
        • Collections

        About

        • General Information
        • Staff
        • Editorial Board
        • Advisory Panel
        • Contact Us
        • Reprints
        • Copyright and Permissions
        CMAJ Group

        Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

        All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

        To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

        CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

         

         

        Powered by HighWire