Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Setting an implementation research agenda for Canadian investments in global maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: a research prioritization exercise

Renee Sharma, Matthew Buccioni, Michelle F. Gaffey, Omair Mansoor, Helen Scott, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta and for the Canadian Expert Group on Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health*
January 31, 2017 5 (1) E82-E89; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160088
Renee Sharma
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Buccioni
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle F. Gaffey
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omair Mansoor
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Scott
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
MBBSPhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Centre for Global Child Health (Sharma, Buccioni, Gaffey, Mansoor, Bhutta), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Partnership for Women and Children's Health (Scott), Ottawa, Ont.
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Identification of priority research questions from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative literature. Note: CHW = community health worker, IMCI = integrated management of childhood illness, PMTCT = Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1: Criteria for implementation (Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative)
    CriterionSubquestions
    Answerable by researchWould you say the research question is well framed?
    Can a single study or a very small number of studies be designed to answer the research question?
    Do you think that a study needed to answer the proposed research question would obtain ethical approval without major concerns?
    Research feasibilityIs it likely that there will be sufficient capacity to carry out the proposed research?
    Is it feasible to provide the training required for staff to carry out the research?
    Is the cost and time required for this research reasonable?
    DeliverabilityTaking into account the level of difficulty with implementation of the potential delivery strategy (e.g., need for change of attitudes and beliefs, supervision, transport infrastructure), would you say that this strategy would be deliverable?
    Taking into account the resources available to implement the intervention, would you say that the potential delivery strategy would be affordable?
    Taking into account government capacity and partnership required, would you say that the potential delivery strategy would be sustainable?
    ImpactWill the results of this research fill an important knowledge gap?
    Are the results from this research likely to shape future planning and implementation?
    Will the results of this research lead to a long-term reduction in disease burden?
    Effect on equityWould you say that the present distribution of the target disease burden/health issue affects mainly the poor and marginalized in the population?
    Would you say that the poor and marginalized would be the most likely to benefit from the results of the proposed research?
    Would you say that the proposed research has the overall potential to improve equity in disease burden distribution in the long-term (e.g., 10 yr)?
    • View popup
    Table 2: Top 15 research questions according to their achieved RPS, with AEA related to each question
    RankResearch questionCriterion 1: answerable
    by research
    Criterion 2: research feasibilityCriterion 3: deliverabilityCriterion 4: impactCriterion 5: equityRPSAEA
    1How can caregivers be mentored in recognizing child health danger signs (e.g., for pneumonia)?0.900.970.910.890.8089.250.82
    2Identify and evaluate delivery strategies to increase coverage of oral rehydration solution and zinc among remote populations and the poorest of the poor.0.740.910.760.940.9886.610.78
    3Can improved methods of detecting and managing dehydration in children with diarrhea reduce mortality?0.930.880.880.850.7786.260.82
    4Evaluate whether coverage of antibiotic treatment can be greatly expanded in safe and effective ways if administered by community health workers.0.800.910.810.950.8285.620.79
    5How can smart phoneintegrated community case management apps be implemented to accurately identify newborns and under-5 children requiring referral from their communities to a health facility?0.880.930.850.900.6684.230.78
    6What are effective delivery strategies to ensure that the most vulnerable individuals receive critical RMNCAH services?0.700.850.680.950.9983.310.77
    7Evaluate ways to reduce the financial barriers to facility births at the community level, such as through user fee exemptions, emergency loans, conditional cash transfers and transportation vouchers.0.730.890.780.840.8782.050.74
    8Can a simplified neonatal resuscitation program delivered by trained health workers reduce deaths due to intrapartum events and complications and birth asphyxia?0.810.890.910.770.7081.690.77
    9Can a standardized newborn kit (simple bag/mask, clean blades/knives, and cord clamps) with appropriate education reduce newborn mortality and morbidity?0.780.930.820.660.9081.540.72
    10How can mobile technology be used to identify mothers and children at risk, reduce unneeded transports and facilitate earlier timed care?0.810.880.780.850.7581.520.75
    11What factors drive care-seeking behaviour during childhood diarrheal disease, and how can we position oral rehydration solution and zinc to best respond to these factors?0.620.810.880.880.8881.320.71
    12Identify and evaluate strategies for retention and motivation of community health workers.0.730.950.820.840.7181.300.73
    13Identify innovative mechanisms to support and utilize existing trained but underutilized human resources in health (such as community midwives in Pakistan, auxiliary nurse midwives in India, and clinical officers in Malawi) to provide high-quality maternal health services in remote and rural areas.0.640.840.740.880.9380.620.72
    14How can we overcome the barriers to implementing kangaroo care in low-resource settings?0.760.940.890.870.5379.750.72
    15How can we overcome barriers to uptake of modern contraceptives in settings with very low prevalence of contraceptive use?0.590.930.800.870.7979.610.72

    Note: AEA = average expert agreement, RMNCAH, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health, RPS = research priority score.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    CMAJ Open: 5 (1)
    Vol. 5, Issue 1
    1 Jan 2017
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author

    Article tools

    Respond to this article
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Setting an implementation research agenda for Canadian investments in global maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: a research prioritization exercise
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Setting an implementation research agenda for Canadian investments in global maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: a research prioritization exercise
    Renee Sharma, Matthew Buccioni, Michelle F. Gaffey, Omair Mansoor, Helen Scott, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, for the Canadian Expert Group on Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health*
    Jan 2017, 5 (1) E82-E89; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160088

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Setting an implementation research agenda for Canadian investments in global maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: a research prioritization exercise
    Renee Sharma, Matthew Buccioni, Michelle F. Gaffey, Omair Mansoor, Helen Scott, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, for the Canadian Expert Group on Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health*
    Jan 2017, 5 (1) E82-E89; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160088
    Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like

    Related Articles

    • Correction: Setting an implementation research agenda for Canadian investments in global maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: a research prioritization exercise
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    Similar Articles

    Content

    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections

    About

    • General Information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisory Panel
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints
    • Copyright and Permissions
    CMAJ Group

    Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

    All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

    To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

    CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

     

     

    Powered by HighWire