Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Open access
    • Contact
  • RSS feeds
Research

Comparing stage of diagnosis of cervical cancer at presentation in immigrant women and long-term residents of Ontario: a retrospective cohort study

Teja Voruganti, Rahim Moineddin, Nathaniel Jembere, Laurie Elit, Eva Grunfeld and Aisha K. Lofters
August 12, 2016 4 (3) E424-E430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160029
Teja Voruganti
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahim Moineddin
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel Jembere
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie Elit
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
MDMSC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Grunfeld
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
MDDPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aisha K. Lofters
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Voruganti, Moineddin, Grunfeld); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Moineddin, Grunfeld, Lofters), University of Toronto; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Moineddin, Jembere, Lofters), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Elit), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Grunfeld), Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Lofters), St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
MDPhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Selection of study cohort.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1: Characteristics of women in the study cohort with cervical cancer diagnosed in Ontario in 2010-2014
    CharacteristicNo. (%)*
    Immigrants (n = 345)Long-term residents
     (n = 1380)
    Standardized mean difference†
    Age, yr,  mean ± SD52 ± 14.752 ± 14.70.03
    Neighbourhood income quintile
        1 (lowest)96 (27.8)304 (22.0)0.3
        293 (27.0)271 (19.6)
        347 (13.6)278 (20.1)
        464 (18.6)271 (19.6)
        5 (highest)44 (12.8)247 (17.9)
    Missing data< 5 (NA)< 5 (NA)
    Rurality index
        Major urban332 (96.0)937 (67.9)0.9
        Nonmajor urban< 5 (NA)324 (23.5)
        Rural< 5 (NA)108 (7.8)
        Missing data< 5 (NA)8 (0.6)
    Aggregated diagnosis group
        0 (no comorbidity)23 (6.7)108 (7.8)0.1
        1-5163 (47.2)655 (47.4)
        6-9105 (30.4)445 (32.2)
        ≥ 10 (high comorbidity)54 (15.7)172 (12.5)
    Time since last screening, yr
        > 3 126 (36.5)465 (33.7)0.1
        3-532 (9.3)162 (11.7)
        > 511 (3.2)38 (2.8)
        Never screened174 (50.4)715 (51.8)
    Visit to gynecologist in past 3 yr
        Yes204 (59.1)788 (57.1)0.04
        No141 (40.9)592 (42.9)
        Missing data--
    No. of health contacts in past 3 yr,  mean ± SD30.7 ± 25.329.0 ± 30.30.05
    Diagnosis of HIV< 5 (NA)< 5 (NA)-
    Family physician sex
        Female118 (34.2)507 (36.7)0.2
        Male222 (64.3)798 (57.8)
        Missing data6 (1.7)64 (4.6)
    Family physician is an international medical graduate
        Yes154 (44.6)250 (18.1)0.6
        No186 (53.9)1066 (77.2)
        Missing data6 (1.7)64 (4.6)
    Family physician in a patient enrollment model
        Yes296 (85.8)1207 (87.5)0.3
        No45 (13.0)112 (8.1)
        Missing data< 5 (NA)61 (4.4)

    Note: NA = not available.

    *Unless otherwise specified.

    †Values > 0.1 are considered important differences.

      • View popup
      Table 2: Characteristics of immigrant women in Ontario with a diagnosis of cervical cancer
      CharacteristicCervical cancer, no. (%)n = 345
      OverallNo known stageEarly stageLate stage
      Immigrant class
         Economic134 (38.8)43 (33.9)55 (46.6)36 (36.0)
         Family162 (47.0)64 (50.4)45 (38.1)53 (53.0)
         Refugee with landing visa48 (13.9)19 (15.0)18 (15.3)11 (11.0)
         Other< 5 (NA)< 5 (NA)--
      Language ability
         English or French195 (56.5)75 (59.1)71 (60.2)49 (49.0)
         Other150 (43.5)52 (40.9)47 (39.8)51 (51.0)
      Region of origin
         Africa8 (2.3)< 5 (NA)6 (5.1)< 5 (NA)
         Caribbean26 (7.5)11 (8.7)9 (7.6)6 (6.0)
         East Asia117 (34.2)40 (31.5)46 (39.0)31 (31.0)
         Latin America29 (8.4)10 (7.9)11 (9.3)8 (8.0)
         Middle East20 (5.8)12 (9.4)< 5 (NA)< 5 (NA)
         South Asia48 (13.9)22 (17.3)< 5 (NA)22 (22.0)
         Western Europe and USA94 (27.2)30 (23.6)36 (30.5)28 (28.0)

      Note: NA = not available.

        • View popup
        Table 3: Bivariate and multivariate analysis showing unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with respect to the probability of late stage versus early stage for the study cohort
        CharacteristicUnadjusted OR (95% CI)p valueAdjusted OR (95% CI)p value
        Immigrant status
            Long-term resident0.99 (0.70-1.40)0.90.94 (0.63-1.39)0.7
            Immigrant1.001.00
        Income quintile
            1 (lowest)0.85 (0.54-1.36)0.80.87 (0.53-1.43)0.6
            21.02 (0.62-1.67)0.99 (0.58-1.70)
            30.86 (0.53-1.41)0.92 (0.54-1.58)
            41.05 (0.64-1.73)1.33 (0.78-2.27)
            5 (highest)1.001.00
        Rurality index
            Rural0.98 (0.53-1.80)< 1.00.94 (0.45-1.93)0.7
            Nonmajor urban0.95 (0.67-1.38)0.85 (0.55-1.30)
            Major urban1.001.00
        Aggregated diagnosis group
            0 (no comorbidity)3.29 (1.51-7.15)0.00061.66 (0.60-4.59)0.2
            1-51.50 (0.93-2.43)1.18 (0.61-2.27)
            6-90.88 (0.52-1.48)0.78 (0.42-1.45)
            ≥ 10 (high comorbidity)1.001.00
        Time since last screening, yr*
            > 30.41 (0.29-0.59)< 0.0001--
            3-50.48 (0.28-0.81)
            > 51.88 (0.54-6.54)
            Never screened1.00
        Visit to gynecologist in the past 3 yr
            No2.73 (2.00-3.73)< 0.00012.47 (1.8-3.50)< 0.0001
            Yes1.001.00
        Family physician sex
            Female0.69 (0.50-0.95)0.020.71 (0.50-1.00)0.06
            Male1.001.00
        Family physician in a patient enrolment model
            No1.65 (0.99-2.77)0.061.72 (0.98-3.00)0.06
            Yes1.001.00
        No. of health care contacts in past 3 yr0.99 (0.97-1.00)0.011.00 (0.99-1.01)0.9

        Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

        *Screening was excluded from multivariate analysis because lack of screening could be on the causal pathway

        PreviousNext
        Back to top

        In this issue

        CMAJ Open: 4 (3)
        Vol. 4, Issue 3
        4 Aug 2016
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author

        Article tools

        Respond to this article
        Print
        Download PDF
        Article Alerts
        To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
        Email Article

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        Comparing stage of diagnosis of cervical cancer at presentation in immigrant women and long-term residents of Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Citation Tools
        Comparing stage of diagnosis of cervical cancer at presentation in immigrant women and long-term residents of Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
        Teja Voruganti, Rahim Moineddin, Nathaniel Jembere, Laurie Elit, Eva Grunfeld, Aisha K. Lofters
        Jul 2016, 4 (3) E424-E430; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160029

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        Comparing stage of diagnosis of cervical cancer at presentation in immigrant women and long-term residents of Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
        Teja Voruganti, Rahim Moineddin, Nathaniel Jembere, Laurie Elit, Eva Grunfeld, Aisha K. Lofters
        Jul 2016, 4 (3) E424-E430; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160029
        Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like

        Related Articles

        • PubMed
        • Google Scholar

        Cited By...

        • Qui est Noir? Il est urgent de preciser la definition de la population noire dans la realisation de recherches sur la sante au Canada
        • Who is Black? The urgency of accurately defining the Black population when conducting health research in Canada
        • Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004-2013: a descriptive study
        • Google Scholar

        Similar Articles

        Content

        • Current issue
        • Past issues
        • Collections

        About

        • General Information
        • Staff
        • Editorial Board
        • Advisory Panel
        • Contact Us
        • Reprints
        • Copyright and Permissions
        CMAJ Group

        Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

        All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

        To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

        CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

         

         

        Powered by HighWire